17631 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Player's hand moved by that player is considered deliberate.
The exception could be only nudge from bystander or some other violation of player's will caused from outside.
Not according to what i've been told (and according to what happened in navara's case; moisenko claimed navara touched the king and then the bishop, not that he touched both pieces. Navara tought he touched the two pieces together but wasn't sure himself, therefore he offered the draw).
Moiseenko's own words on the episode:"Navara on the 35th move first touched the King. I told him: the King moves. However, I realized that my opponent accidentally made this mistake, it is not possible that he could so easily blunder the piece. This is the reason I did not insist on his move with the King.
The USCF rules specifically mention "accidental" touch as a not activitating the touch-move rule. A sleeve brushing a king while reaching for another piece is a common occurance. USCF and FIDE often differ. USCF rules are far more verbose.
Except as provided in Article 4.2, if the player having the move deliberately touches on the chessboard......[a description of the touch-move rule follows]
which seems to indicate that only intentional touches are sanctioned, as we (ma and plutonia) are claiming.
Yes, it's standard practice that only intentional touches are sanctioned.
It's even mentioned in the wikipedia that accidentelly touching a piece does not count ( e.g. brushing against it while reaching for another piece) and every competition in the planet follows this rule.
That article that was linked earlier is just wrong.
Adjusting a piece is a different thing, because you intentionally reach for a piece. That's why you have to say it first, because your hand clearly goes to grab that particular piece. But if you accidentally touch a piece while reaching for another one, how could you have said it in advance? You didn't know it was going to happen!
"I don't get what you're talking about, I played the poisoned pawn just like that until move 14.
Where's the blunder? "
Move 10 f4. Black can play Qxc3 check, take the rook next and there is not enough compensation.
The Parham Reversed
Standard practice is you must move touched piece. Accidental touch can be done by sleeve or when something has disturbed you - here you can have a chance to persuade arbiter, however once you touch or grab the piece with your fingers, no chance anymore. You may be cross-eyed or suffer with Parkinson's disease, but you can't talk your way out of it. FIDE sanctioned competitions have strict rules. Lack of concentration and/or clumsiness do not qualify such touch as "accidental". Opponent may forgive you - and this is considered fair play and gentlemanship, but he isn't obliged to.
This is what happened in the game mentioned before I think. Black touched or even grabbed his queen with fingers causing him to move Qe7. If you think he would have been allowed to make another move in such case, you haven't understood FIDE rules enough.
Here is another game. Check out Whites 6th. He drops a piece and Black does not take it !
Please read the damn rulebook! You guys are so idiotic, I don`t even want to be in the same room taking a shit with you guys masturbating one another.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1430997 has 6. h4 (and later h5 and Bxh5).
why isn't botvinnik talked about as much
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 5 minutes ago
who likes who in staafff the most staff the ko
by Fresh_from_the_Oven 5 minutes ago
11/28/2014 - Inch By Inch
by marsuplami 6 minutes ago
by pfren 6 minutes ago
A not-so-simple mate in 2
by chaotic_iak 6 minutes ago
how much logic was behind tal's sacrafices
by yeres30 8 minutes ago
sexism in chess?
by Elubas 9 minutes ago
Nakamura explains chess
by Addicted-to-Chess97 9 minutes ago
Carlsen's next opponent in the WCC match
by CrazyJae 11 minutes ago
The Backyard Professor
by Ziryab 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!