9626 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Matter of taste.
yes, but still proves that there is no refutation to e4, as there are so many continuations that have been well-established and analyzed, with theory going 20+ moves deep. If you don't like one, there are almost infinitely many others to choose from!
True in any sensible opening.
1.e4 Refuted?? Heck, no!!
So long as the bongcloud is around, 1.e4 is alive and well!!!
I could not agree more!
Even the sensibility of an opening (or lack thereof) can be a very subjective and personal matter. Just like college classes. :P
What's the Berlin??????
What's the Berlin??????
if the berlin were to refute anything it would be the ruy lopez. there are many different tries for white to gain an advantage such as the scotch, vienna, and the italian game (can even transpose into variations of the ruy lopez that avoids the berlin usually for a tempo)
The Berlin is a game, with white probably having a tiny something with perfect play. The better player is usually the side that wins, but lower rated white players most likely have better chances to win than lower rated black players due to the potential of white's kingside pawn majority.
What's the Berlin??????
kasparov has a nice game where he tears down the berlin wall...
what? i thought Kasparov had a terrible record with the Berlin in a series he coudn't beat Kramnik once at all and when he played it he lost
has anyone tried to not exchange queens in the berlin to try and play for a win?
it's considered better to trade queens but neither gives white much to play around with unless you seriously understand the position, generally pawn structure weaknesses are harder to deal with without queens so that's the idea (to use the better pawn majority in the endgame) behind trading queens not the lack of black castling.
keeping the queens on the board makes white's better majority less impressive
Qe2 would be a good move if white could actually avoid the exchange of queens. However the idea of Nf5 is to play Nd4.
So in the position black plays 9. ... Nd4 10. Nxd4 Qxd4 11. Rd1 Bg4 and black is atleast equal.
People have a tendency to ridiculously overstate their topic to draw in contributors. As far as I know.. it has never failed.
Just because a position might not look very appetizing to you doesn't mean that the whole line if refuted. Look at GM games. It is sort of a game of chicken between white and black. Deep Fritz 13 plays this line sometimes. It is quite strong. But by that logic, doesn't just about every line get refuted by a strong reply? (which to my understanding just about every line DOES have a strong reply.)
okay thanks just wondering why no one played that line
I posted an article a few weeks ago where I suggested 8. Nbd2 instead of 8. Qe2. This ensures the queens are kept on, and in my opinion, leads to complex play where white has a chance to play for the advantage (or at least make black think for himself).
Yep it has at the top level but of course you need to be Kramnik
when Q's are traded castling is not a big problem
The Chessboard Killer
by Mersaphe a few minutes ago
Drueke chess set
by 9kick9 11 minutes ago
Is there something like a chess fetish on chess.com? Is it dangerous for my son?
by DrCheckevertim 12 minutes ago
Chess just make you selfish and reduce your empathy?
by chessmicky 12 minutes ago
Game against much stronger player in sicilian najdorf.
by mjh1991 12 minutes ago
do Americans really see Bobby as one of the greatest players
by JPRace 13 minutes ago
Which one chess book has improved your playing strength the most?
by kclemens 15 minutes ago
Publisher spells "chess" wrong
by chessmicky 15 minutes ago
9/14/2014 - Mate in 2
by mauve_penguin 20 minutes ago
Invent the new worst/most useless chess piece ever!
by ebillgo 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!