10258 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Nope, this does not work because of Nxb7 which is your queen.
However, this could be interesting:
Nope, this does not work since Nxb7 which is your queen.
Yeah, I see what you are saying. His knight would have my Queen. I missed that.
I just saw your, and yours is definitely a lot better than me as you keep the knight at bay. Nice! Also, here are the other two I was talking about:
What's the point of both 8...d4 and 8...Bd6?
Probably blunders form his opponent. But when you play blitz sometimes you can make mistakes you know.
This is one of the oldest gambits and it can be very complicated for both sides and very risky. Why would White take that risk when he has a chance to start the game first? That's why it's not being played by grand masters. However, that doesn't mean that it is not playable. To be honest, I wouldn't play this gambit in an official tournament even though I got my first win in a USCF tournament with another variation of king's gambit accepted. The funny part is that this tumbleweed variation has 100% winning rate since there are only two games in chess.com's database and the games go back to early 1900s.
Here is a 3 minute blitz game that I just played (along with 2500 strength computer analysis);
Move 8 is a killer move in this game because Black could either lose his queen or get check mated with bishop and a rook. My opponent used most of his time on that move then he found the two bishop sacrifice.
In total he got 8 blunders in the game and I got only one and that was because of timing. After move 37 we both had about 10 seconds on our clock. You can find the details in the analysis.
Siegbert Tarrasch - Theodore Von Scheve, Nuremberg 1883 (Difficulty=Hard)
by czechhappens 5 minutes ago
Anyone want to practise French exchange variation?
by General-Mayhem 5 minutes ago
1600 at last!
by Chicken_Monster 13 minutes ago
True or false? Chess will never be solved! why?
by chessmstrmate 32 minutes ago
BLOCKING ADS? WELL PLAYED...
by bobyyyy 35 minutes ago
Hou Yifan about to become strongest female player in the world
by Mersaphe 36 minutes ago
Looking for live relayers of chess events
by jaunius13579 40 minutes ago
Is Kramnik Going Downhill?
by fabelhaft 58 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by December_TwentyNine 63 minutes ago
News Flash!! Sarcasm gets you banned.
by December_TwentyNine 65 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!