Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

How good do you have to be to play the Sicilian

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #121


    @Chess_is_my_God - thanks for the post - so it's not just me!

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #122


    I'm just going to put this on here. 



  • 7 months ago · Quote · #123


  • 7 months ago · Quote · #124


    sicilianka noooo 23gujhgruop gg

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #125


    Username333 wrote:

    I'm just going to put this on here. 



    I watched this about halfway.  e5 is so easy it's amazing that all GMs don't play it.  Instant win as black.

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #126


    I watched the video and I'll give a summary. The first few minutes is about how easily the sicilian can go wrong for us mere mortals and the the rest of it is how much more intuitive it is to play 1...e5 against 1. e4 - the guy goes through several openings - worth viewing when you have 30 minutes to spare.

    It sort of goes to the point implied in my posts - the sicilian is best left to advanced players, if you are playing for a win (of course anyone can play whatever opening for learning or for fun).

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #127


    SilentKnighte5 wrote:
    FNTRK wrote:
    SilentKnighte5 wrote:

    I think there should be a rule that if you are under 1800 USCF you can't play certain openings or you forfeit.  It would be much better for the game.

    That's the stupidest thing I've heard in quite some time.

    Sorry, but a bunch of 1200s running around trying to play the Sicilian or Catalan is bad for chess.

    No offense intended, but on here you are about a 1200, so you would have to subject yourself to those rules. Would you want to play a game where you don't have freedom of which openings to play? That's what you would have to do if those rules were in place. People can play whichever openings they want, and making rules about which openings to play and which not to play would be a disastrous mistake. It would prevent the players from having freedom in their opening decisions, and furthermore, many players would tell you that the Sicilians are more fun than any other chess opening complex. Since a vast majority of chessplayers play for fun, I think this would be a terrible decision.

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #128


    Dont listen to them Mark ... how can you draw your own life lessons here, how can you really learn .. only person that means anything here is you!

    therefore if its right or wrong, you must decide, you must analyze..

    i know my ratings is not as high here, but Over the board thats a different story.. so mark keep chipping away at the Siclian, best lessons are learned by blood, by sweat, not by a smart a$$ on post, so keep exploring, keep making mistakes.. because you will learn..and it would be worth enjoying the post

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #129


    I_Am_Second wrote:
    Fischer had a great quote on the accelerated dragon: "Sac..Sac...Mate.  Ive played this so many times i should apply for a patent."

    Fischers game against Larsen killed the AD for awhile. 

    This is in reference to the Yugoslav Attack of the regular Dragon. The Accelerated Dragon is a positional system that is normally played to circumvent the sharp attacks with opposite side castling in the Yugoslav Attack.

    The Accelerated Dragon with 2...g6 is fairly low maintenance in comparison with a lot of other Sicilians, but you might get tired of the Maroczy Bind as you reach expert level.

    The Kan and Taimanov with 2...e6 is also a practical choice for the amateur, as many of the lines are not as sharp as you would find in more popular Sicilians. The under 2000 crowd often gets confused by the amorphous qualities of these systems that delay the advance of the d-pawn. For instance, someone who normally plays the English Attack against the Najdorf will likely end up worse if they try the same system against the Kan since ...Bb4 + ...d5 is an additional option. Combine this flexibility with understanding of Scheveningen structures and you have an excellent practical weapon.

    The Sicilian is a double-edged sword, but you can minimize risk by adopting positional systems that are often overlooked by other amateurs.

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #130


    Speaking of dragon systems (especially accelerated but also the main dragon) why would you want to play a system where d5 is terribly weak and attempts to cover it result in a weak d6 pawn!?  True, d5 is a weak spot in most Najdorf lines too, but it isn't as pronounced unless you go wrong somewhere.  In the Najdorf you don't have the g6 pawn which white can use as a hook/lever for attacks. 

    Whether it's the dragon or Najdorf I hope you have great major piece endgame technique!  Those tend to be common.  

    I second MetalRatel's Paulsen/Kan suggestion.  It's a great choice, though one major drawback is it circumvents the Moscow variation.  After 1.e4,c5 2.Nf3,e6 3.Bb5?!,a6 4.Be2 when black is practically playing the white side of an English defense.  In fact Tartakower and Lasker played such a game!

    Lasker's defensive technique was breathtaking!  Qxe5! is especially instructive as it doesn't plug a pivot square (Nimzowitsch's term) with a pawn. The way he used his passed pawn and strong diagonal was great.  The king was too exposed not to mention being up the exchange.  Even white's connected passed pawns weren't enough to cope with that initiative.

    Anyway the Moscow being played is only a plus if you know the theory since it's more relaxed than the mainline Najdorf and in some variations white's d4 is weak especially in lines with c4.  Like any other sound opening the Moscow is anyone's game however but you have more leeway than mainlines. 

    Oh, 1.e4,c5 2.Nf3,d6 3.d4,cxd4 4.Nxd4,Nf6 5.f3 is something you'd want to study, it's the featured line in Steamrolling the Sicilian. 

Back to Top

Post your reply: