7937 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I was wondering what the different ways to avoid the Sicilian Sveshnikov from the Kalashnikov were. I'm looking for something aggressive, even if a little positionally suspect. Thanks in advance,
Why do you want to avoid the Chelyabinsk/ Sveshnikov?
It's a very sound and reliable opening, while the mainlines of the Kalashnikov are quite passive for black.
The only reason could be the theoretical bulk... but this is more or less unavoidable when playing mainline sicilians.
I guess you could put the knight on e7.
Well, I recently saw Igor Alexandre Nataf's game against John Nunn which inspired me very much. You are right that the reason I'm avoiding it is the theoretical bulk, I'm just too lazy to study the Kalashnikov AND the Sveshnikov.
As for the lines in the Kalashnikov being passive for Black, I'm willing to take extra risks in order to create more winning chances such as the variation 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e5 5. Nb5 d6 6. c4 Be7 7. N1c3 a6 8. Na3 f5 played in the Nataf game.
Keep in mind I am new to this opening and don't know too much about it, so I'm not aware of passive lines Black cannot avoid. Thank you for your response so far.
This has the "slight" disadvantage of dropping the d6 pawn with check, and the queen next move. I would prefer something more reliable.
Black has 6...a6 7.Na3 and now Black may try 7...b5 (Nataf's main choice) or 7...Be7, or finally 7...Be6, but IMO all are quite inferior to 7...Nf6 which is a direct transposition to a Sveshnikov after 8.Bg5.
Thanks pfren. In your opinion, would it be a good or bad idea to model one's repertoire and style after one specific high rated player (in this case Nataf)? I'm really liking his openings and style, so perhaps I should just copy him?
I'm sure 6...a6 7.Na3 Ne7 has been played before.
As am I, what's your point?
Ne7 wins by force of course!
6...a6 7. Na3 Ne7 8. Nc4 seems to show that black has too many weaknesses. d6 needs more defending, and next white can play Be3 and target b6 or play Nd5 when black moves the knight from e7.
romolisslo is the answer!!
Ruy lopez as black
by Moses2792796 a few minutes ago
Beginners Should Learn Opening Theory!
by Exegesisnumberone a few minutes ago
6/16/2013 - The Last Attempt
by Timeyo_R_Nkosi 4 minutes ago
Defender or Attacker?
by xxvalakixx 11 minutes ago
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 for White
by xxvalakixx 13 minutes ago
FM Borislav Ivanov Disqualified
by Ubik42 20 minutes ago
Chess experiment: How much does three pints of beer impact your chess ability?
by DrJamesB 26 minutes ago
Will technology ruin the game of chess?
by Ubik42 27 minutes ago
6/17/2013 - Mate in 3
by peerpandit 31 minutes ago
Chess Mentor lessons record
by LegoPirateSenior 36 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com