Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

How to Blast out Kings gambit???


  • 12 months ago · Quote · #41

    jetfighter13

    obviously does not play that normally

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #42

    red_ratfan

    ok

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #43

    Rubidium

    Thanks for all the computer analysis. Thanks for answering my questions!

    Smile

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #44

    jetfighter13

    the double muzio is fun alright, always make sure to look at your opponents face when you play this though.

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #45

    jetfighter13

    most people who play will just look at you strange, like this can't be good, or they may do one of those like WTF looks at the board

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #46

    red_ratfan

    ok cool

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #47

    Rubidium

    What is the double muzio?

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #48

    jetfighter13

    insanity on the board

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #49

    batgirl

    The Double Muzio probably (maybe definitely) isn't sound, but proving it isn't so easy.  I suspect at a high level, it would score quite low, but at an intermediate level it's one of the most fun openings for White (if Black will cooperate and allow for it).

    I had done a series on the Muzio and part three dealt with the Double or Wild Muzio which may or may not be of interest.

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #51

    Musikamole

    Provide Black does not know the King's Gambit Declined, particularly 1.e4 e5 2.f4 Bc5, then I would be happy to play the White side. I always meet the KG with 2...Bc5, and have an easy time.

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #52

    jetfighter13

    odd cause I tend to do pretty well against that variation of the KGD, others not so much

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #53

    Pohjanpoika

    Wich defences are conciderd the best for black in the King´s Gambit? How does Fischers Defence do nowadays and wich defence does KG players here see most of?

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #54

    jetfighter13

    I see some wierd stuff against my bishop's gambit, and even wierder stuff if they don't accept, like Nh6, a6,f6,d6,Na6 and other stuff like that. on both moves two and three.

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #55

    hessmaster

    if you accept kings gambit you die.

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #56

    jetfighter13

    not always, it is just the position becomes a minefield of tactics.

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #57

    Pohjanpoika

    I am not sure of thee name. Kieseritsky Gambit maybe? But Black accepts the gambit (wich seems best to me) 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.h6 g4 5.Ne5 and here comes diffrent moves, d6 for example. Giving back the pawn but makes it hard for white to castle.  Seems good for black, atleast it is very complicated.

    I like to play the Kings Gambit and I´m starting to get harder resistance so I am interested in wich lines are good for black.

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #58

    jetfighter13

    I thought you said the KG looses for white, now you advocate complete avoidance, sounding a bit hipocritical arn't we.

    anyway, I think that g5 is blacks best shot against Nf3 against Bc4 just play Nf6 and your game will be fine, also if anyone wants to play a CC game against me I am fine with that, just make it unrated. and I will give a return game with me as black (or white, whichever is the oposite of the first game) and those moves are for accepting the gambit, never decline it.

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #59

    jetfighter13

    The parham is fairly easy to defend against if you are not confused, which I got confused because people rarely play it against me out of respect for my sanity.

    The KG on the other hand has some 500 years proving its soundness, and toss in a WIN vs. KASPAROV, arguably the best player ever. and Wins by Morphy, FISCHER (who you claim thought the KG lost, he didn't thats why he played it), SPASSKY (who had beautiful wins against FISCHER, and other notable players of the era). all you have on your side is the confusion factor, and a player who would loose to all of my above sorces (and Morphy would probably do it with a Knight handicap) so I am sticking with history and the Greatest players ever, a hundred years from now no one will remember Naka, they will remember FISCHER, SPASSKY, KASPAROV, MORPHY, and the most recent practitioner of the most historic opening ever, CARLSEN.

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #60

    ChristianSoldier007

    jetfighter13 wrote:

    The parham is fairly easy to defend against if you are not confused, which I got confused because people rarely play it against me out of respect for my sanity.

    The KG on the other hand has some 500 years proving its soundness, and toss in a WIN vs. KASPAROV, arguably the best player ever. and Wins by Morphy, FISCHER (who you claim thought the KG lost, he didn't thats why he played it), SPASSKY (who had beautiful wins against FISCHER, and other notable players of the era). all you have on your side is the confusion factor, and a player who would loose to all of my above sorces (and Morphy would probably do it with a Knight handicap) so I am sticking with history and the Greatest players ever, a hundred years from now no one will remember Naka, they will remember FISCHER, SPASSKY, KASPAROV, MORPHY, and the most recent practitioner of the most historic opening ever, CARLSEN.

    true that at the end. unless naka goes for the title, which i doubt, he will be remembered like tarrasch or one of those guys... a side not in histroy when compared to the greats


Back to Top

Post your reply: