18758 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Don't worry about a repertoire until you stop losing games because you overlook very simple tactics.
Sure, eventually you will want to gain some experience with 1 d4 positions, but for now be satisfied with learning to play Black against it. Starting with 1 e4 is best because it leads to the structures which are most basic and easiest to learn, and open games will help you learn piece play - as well as to find tactics for yourself and your opponent.
I pretty much just pick an opening and run with it - now unlike some, I HATE e4/e5 games as black, so I play the French and the Sicilian - but God knows I don't memorize hundreds of moves or lines. Just use the ideas, mostly. With white I almost always play e4 because I like the Ruy and the Sicilian from white's side.
When your play in an opening variation becomes mechanical, then it is time to play something else.
Modern masters prefer the last one, since they want a small edge with white. An extremely sharp game is hardly the way to keep an edge (since a small inaccuary loose the game or the edge), and in d4 you can make a few mistakes and still be in the game.
I believe the real reason that d4 outshines e4 these days is that it is easier for black to play for a draw after 1. e4. This is also why, although e4 still appears at top level tournaments where players playing black may still be looking for a win, it has completely disappeared from the last 3 WC matches where a draw with black is considered a good result. The only time Anand played 1. e4 against Kramnik in their match was when Kramnik had to win to stay in the match.
Note: It was Kramnik who basically killed 1. e4 in matchplay by drawing every game with black in his match against Kasparov.
Theres really only two 'drawing lines' against 1.e4 that have appeared in WC matches..the infamous Berlin Wall and the Petroff. Its not Kramnik's fault that nobody has yet found serious winning chances for White in the Berlin endgame or that the White players have been scared to play the sharpest lines against the Petroff.
"The 2nd Millionaire Chess Tournament - Round 5"
Why are women not as successful as men in chess?
by Harvey_Wallbanger a few minutes ago
by newengland7 a few minutes ago
I'm convinced now - studying too many tactics makes me worse
by Harvey_Wallbanger 3 minutes ago
Is The USCF Needed or Is It a Dunsel Organization
by Ziryab 4 minutes ago
by petrikeckman 14 minutes ago
Millionaire Chess 2!!
by royalprobe 15 minutes ago
Who will Win FIDE Women´s Grand Prix? 3-15 October 2015
by P_or 17 minutes ago
What is the plan for black to win in short castle Sicilian Dragon Variation
by Veganomnomnom 21 minutes ago
I did not resign.
by Facetious_Jackson 22 minutes ago
Chess Bazaar's New Soviet Set--A Pictorial Review
by wiscmike 24 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!