13691 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This gambit was made by one of the world's strongest humans -- if only when it came to results against computers. Eduard Nemeth was his name, and with this opening he managed to defeat five of the best commercial chess engines in a single day. Behold his secret weapon:
If you want to try your hand at humiliating a few chess engines, now you know how. Good luck, fellow humans, and may the Force be with you.
I also would like to propose that this gambit hereby be known as the Nemeth Gambit, in memory of the person who invented it. As Black, he played 1. d4 h5 against chess engines with about the same results, though don't hold it against him. :)
I dont like to bring my queen out early.
Sorry to say that this is sheer nonsense.
White is completely lost in the end of the diagram position. Even a patzer (leaving aside strong engines) can win with Black here.
Yeah i agree ,looks very weak
It is a weak position. However, that is not the point; the inspiration behind this gambit is mostly due to a chess engine's inability to look ahead far enough to spot the threats against Black's King. I would certainly not recommend it against human opponents.
And, in retrospection, perhaps modern engines will obtain better results than their ancestors. It would still be amusing to see which engines fall for it... :)
Yeah, 7...Ke6 should hold for Black, right? BTW, Stockfish wouldn't let me play this. He chose 2...g6.
Try setting up the position then. If you use the Arena GUI on Windows, press Control-B. I can't offer advice for any others, though.
g6 loses the knight to Qd5 doesn't it?
Yes. Usually the chess engine prefers ... Ke6 or ... Kf6. After .... Kf6, though, 8. Qh4+ g5 usually unbalances the game enough that White wins.
If you're referring to chessisgood's post, he means : 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 g6.
Um...That was more than 10 years ago. Chess engines are a little better now.
Ah yes sorry, didn't see the number 2!
Playing a Nimzowitsch/Botvinnik center (White pawns on e4 and c4) is pretty effective against engines. They have a bias to reinforce the center, and don't realize it is blocked and all the play is on the wings.
But that's a computer playing against a computer. The whole purpose of an anti-computer opening is that the computer doesn't get what's going on, yes? Hahaha
I'm not pretending I know anything. Honest. I'm just suggesting an opening that might or might not bring down the pedestal most of us (myself included) elevate chess programs with. It may be that the top engines are immune to it, but I suspect that at least a few of the others will encounter trouble. Yes, I completely agree that it is unsound.
excuse me! when Eduard Nemeth did this?
by rooperi a few minutes ago
Your contact form is not working!
by erik a few minutes ago
MY BEST GAMES
by Lovely_Jasmine a few minutes ago
by ChrisWainscott 2 minutes ago
Were the '60's in the '60's ?
by trysts 5 minutes ago
When was I officially screwed?
by ejian 6 minutes ago
put your games here
by ejian 14 minutes ago
3/17/2014 - Outstretched
by rgaines 19 minutes ago
New live board colors
by erik 19 minutes ago
Queen trap in Petrov's D.
by pfren 25 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!