16982 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Should I exchange all my pieces to get into endgame? And should I exchange all my pieces or just a certain type of piece? Like minor pieces or major pieces?
The key aim with tripled pawns is that the last of the 3 pawns is heavily undefended usually and if it is defended by a minor piece, you should exploit this weakness.
If you're wondering how it is a weakness it is because your opponent has reduced attacking potential by using up a minor piece to protect a weak pawn, so by attack the minor piece defending the pawn, you will cause problems, combining an attack on the defender piece and trading pawns can severely damage any "tripled pawn line" your opponent has. This is like "overloading" the defender.
Another way of taking advantage of tripled pawns is to place one of your minor pieces "in between" the pawns, this can become a temporary outpost as for the pawns are now not able to push away your pieces (unless they have other nearby pawns or use their king).
Also, advancing tripled pawns is a weakness, as for the pawns get isolated one by one, so take note of this.
Hope this helped in some way
Yes, it was helpful. I really like the idea of an outpost.
Tripled pawns cannot defend each other, so they are extremely vulnerable to attack. You can attack them with major pieces if they are on an open file. If not you can use the square in front as an outpost.
Exchange whenever it benefits you. If you are fighting for a draw in an endgame, for example, it would be very helpful to exchange into an obviously drawn endgame.
Use your own common sense. This trade will do that, this trade will do that. I don't like that because it exposes my king and gives me doubled pawns, so maybe I won't let my opponent trade that bishop for my kingside knight. My opponent has weak dark squares, so maybe I should trade the dark-squared bishops off to better take advantage of this.
Stuff like that.
I see what you're saying about trading.
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by Somebodysson a few minutes ago
Is this position a draw or a win?
by Otomun a few minutes ago
Borislav Ivanov is BACK!
by Sunshiny a few minutes ago
Does Magnus carlsen have talent?
by MrDamonSmith a few minutes ago
Recent Trends in the English Attack
by SolidKnight5 7 minutes ago
Difficult Caption Contest!
by AndyClifton 7 minutes ago
Puzzles just for fun!
by The_Cosmologist 9 minutes ago
Learning the English
by AndyClifton 11 minutes ago
Chess Puzzle, can you also find the refuation?
by l_davies93 12 minutes ago
0-2224 in less than three years
by apostolis1 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!