15663 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
If you want more universal the Hippo can be played as white and black against everything and will be on the receiving end of a lot of fire power against many opponents. Hope that helps.
This will lead you to utter failure. The Hippo should not be used as a universal system. I have it as part of my Black repertoire. Not like I'm just spouting out something I don't know.
The Hippo should ONLY be played if White does one or more of the following:
A) An early Bc4 (like 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Bc4 e6 etc
B) An early a4 (like 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Be3 a6 5.a4 b6 etc
Yes, I know, but he said he is wanting to play passive and get attacked.
How come no one ever asks for an opening where they are on the defense early on?
I am looking for an opening that suits my style... I like to play passively and be attacked on the kingside, even if I need to have material compensation for that. Who can help me ?
This post was a joke guys, no need to answer it.
If I should select a wild gambit repertoire, where positions are open, white has the intiative, and it doesn't have to be theoretical correct (at 1350, it is not a theoretical novelty on move 15 which decides who wins), I would select 1: e4!
1: e4 e5 2. f4. The Kings Gambit is classical, and mutual chances. Your opponent will probably know it, but learning a few lines and typical sacrifices will make it a dangerous opening.
1. e4 c5 2. d4. Only gambit I ever played against the sicilian. On a ChessCube rating on 2100, I have a score on around 70% after 1: e4 c5 2: d4 cxd4 3: c3 dxc3 4: Nxc3 in 35 games (My score is lower against 3: ... Nf6 and d3), so it's playable in blitz, and with a 2½/3 score in tournament events (ELO around 1800), it's playable in OTB chess.
1: e4 e6 2: d4 d5 3: exd5! exd5 4: c4. Not a gambit, but the isolated pawn gives an initiative.
1: e4 c6 2: d4 d5 3: Nc3 dxe4
I normally play 6. N1e2 against Bf5, 5: Ng5 against Nd7 and main line against Nf6. But my coach recommends:
4: f3!? exf3 5: Nxf3 with unclear play.
The scenario which says that a "tactical" player has to play gambit lines is fundamentally flawed.
Factly, the opening is highly irrelevant to the type of play one wants to apply.
I can mention say GM Vlado Covacevic- a superb tactician, most of his games ended up in a horrible mess with pieces hanging everywhere. Guess what the guy was playing as white? You won't...
The London System!
Theoreticians may shrug in despair, but this is a fact...
I recommend that you change your coach.
The French! Hope your opponent does a Greek Gift Sacrifice, mess up, and end up wasting a bishop for nothing. :D
the french isn't passive at all.... it's an opening where black has to fight from the start. you clearly don't know what you're talking about.
My coach is very nice. His openings are not very theoretical (ELO around 1900-2000), Kings Bishops Gambit, Black Knights Tango (he really loves that one) and Morra Gambit. He don't think positional chess is as fun as wild sacrfices, and accepts that a lower rating, but a sharper repertoire is the way to make chess fun for him.
He is not a private coach, but one in my chess club, so pretty difficult to change him :D.
When you improve, you should play sharp openings, such as gambits or openings where material is often sacrificed. Then you get a feeling of how much the initiative is worth in pawns, which is very important in internatinal chess.
I believe in this theory. However, knowing when to change from gambit play to main lines is very important.
When you improve, you should play sharp openings, such as gambits or openings where material is often sacrificed. Then you get a feeling of how much the initiative is worth in pawns
If that's the reasoning behind his recommendation, ok then. I misread that he recommends that line no matter what level you have, and if it was that he would not be a serious guy, but I support him here.
Queen's Gambit Accepted
by Dunk12 a few minutes ago
chess and respect?
by Ghost_of_P_M 2 minutes ago
by akafett 4 minutes ago
by Sangwin 4 minutes ago
Hey did you realize that the "Ivanov: Criminal?" thread is gone?
by EscherehcsE 6 minutes ago
I did not make last move in this game
by revengeofthepawns 7 minutes ago
Useful trap in the Ruy Lopez
by AnalyticalSchool 7 minutes ago
12/13/2013 - Back Rank Power
by lazylinus 13 minutes ago
I am quitting chess.
by citizenoftheworld91 14 minutes ago
by Gannicus_The_God2 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!