Is the King's gambit dead?

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post
6th November 2007, 03:29pm
#21
by ivandh
GA United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 481
What about 5 g3 pre-empting the bishop's check? White ends up with a wide open centre to develop into (which he had best do quickly...)
1st March 2009, 10:50am
#22
by KedDuff
Jamaica
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 169

There's also the pulse-quickening  6. g3?! fxg  7. 0-0 hxh2+ Kh1

 i used to play that all the time at 10 min time its hard to lose if you know how to play it well.

 

1st March 2009, 11:17am
#23
by KillaBeez
Kansas United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 4071

This is one really old thread

3rd March 2009, 12:44pm
#24
by richie_and_oprah
Marie Byrd Land International
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1861
KillaBeez wrote:

This is one really old thread


Perpsective is everything.

Especially since theory in this opening has not changed so much in the eons that have passed since the OP hit enter.

     I did find reb's post intersting in that this user feels the Nf3 lines still have more venom in them than do the Bc4 variation.  I am not sure I agree wholly, but I do think that the Bc4 is easier for Black to play against.  If Black is willing to play g5 versus Nf3 and can handle both the psychological and real exposure to his king, I think he is just fine and white has hard time proving equality.  But pratically, it is a mine field for Black and if they are 'underbooked', the weeds get real deep, real fast.

     I think there are less tricks Black need be prepared for in the Bc4 lines, but on the intermittient occasions I do give it a punt, I find the Bishop Gambit works better for me.

~ richie_and_oprah

« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.