12344 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I think your full of balony. PFren only uses engines where they are allowed. Even if he does cheat, I am sure PFren did not earn his IM title by cheating OTB. Polar_Bear, I think you need to get out more.
Pfren used engines here, in rated games at chess.com, this is what I am talking about, not some LSS, where he also played and where it may be tolerated. It was plain cheating and if I weren't sure he had violated the rules, I would admire him as master and opening expert with specific sense of humour, as some uninformed idlers still do. Unfortunately under current circumstances his sarcasm is pure insult and impertinence.
If anyone wants to claim a title, he should lead by example in fair play. Pfren failed in this regard.
On top of that, Pfren tells a lie when he makes excuses about centaur DB. It looks reasonable, but it cannot be true.
That's too little or too much.
As much as I dislike the dogmatic waffle that Phren uses AT TIMES, I am afraid I dislike the constant meaningless computer complied nonsense of Sloughterchess even more.
The problem is that this thread is based upon the supposition that any quarter serious player who plays the 2 Knights would be in their right mind to play 5...Nxd5. Really??
No matter how many times you jam a line through one of Chessbase's binary demons or drop names of players, people will always trust the centuries of practice of any opening over the internittent use of a chess engine by a clearly crazy person over a few decades.
From practical viewpoint, Lolli is better than Fried Liver, because it gives white better game without risk. Fried Liver may be good, but if black knows theory and defends accurately, white struggles to maintain compensation for sacrificed piece.
My advice would be: scrap it altogether. As black, just employ Traxler or do not re-take on d5. If you want to avoid heavily theory-infested lines, play Petrov, Italian or Hungarian defence. As white, learn both, Ruy and King's Gambit. Ruy is basic stone for white's 1. e4 repertoire, it shouldn't be avoided and fully replaced neither with Italian or Scotch, because it is necessary for learning slower, positional play.
What is your problem with IM Pfren? I know him long time now on this forum and his comments were mostly very generous and helpfull.
@Pfren : Just let them talk and dont listen to those haters! :)
Well... can we come back on topic?
About the Lolli: 6.d4! Nxd4! (the one and only good reply) 7.c3 b5 8.Bxd5 Qxd5 9.f3! c5 10.cd4 (this is played to be able to redeploy the knight at e2. However, given the brilliant reply from FirebrabdX, white may well be better with 10.0-0!- when more analysis is needed. I believe that this is white's best try for an advantage, but I may well be wrong) 10...cd4 11.Nc3 Qc4 12.Ne2 d3!! (brilliant reply, and definitely NOT a computer's first choice) when Black seems able to hold his own, with accurate play. See my corr. game with FirebrandX, where with precise, active play, he was able to draw.
by Cryogenflame 4 minutes ago
Member Analysis Auditions
by PureDefiance 12 minutes ago
Will I be able to reach Master level?
by abrahampenrose 20 minutes ago
10/9/2015 - In From Behind
by rspell 23 minutes ago
Proposal for a "Gentlemen" setting
by euplere 27 minutes ago
This Site Will Soon Have 13 Million Members !
by kaynight 29 minutes ago
Podium Prediction Plus (PPP) - "World Rapid/Blitz Chess Champs 2015"
by MSC157 32 minutes ago
Why are women not as successful as men in chess?
by Azukikuru 35 minutes ago
by 2travel 36 minutes ago
Carlsen and the quest for 2900
by MSC157 40 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!