13079 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The computer analysis of chess.com surprised me by calling 1...c5 an innacuracy in one of my games and recomending the Scandianvian (1...d5) as the best response to 1.e4.
No, it isn't. Remember Kasparov's words: "Computers are stupid!"
out of everything, the scandinavian? the analyzer must be getting old and crazy...
just a few days ago its alternative to the "inaccurate" sicilian was the french :<
So it happened to you too? The fact that it keeps changing the "best" second move makes it even weirder.
Even Houdini gives 4. Ba4 as an inaccuracy.
Computers can't evaluate openings well, it's why they are given opening books.
P.S: He's talking about Ruy Lopez
Oops, yes I am!
Well, so it is 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 and than Houdini sugests the only good move is the trade, right? Incredible!
I agree with MSC157, computers are kind of stupid with openings. We shouldn't let them trying to figure out the best first move, as they would calculate endless possible lines and find no solution.
So, the real question is: Why did chess.com enable the computer to make comments on book openings? It makes no sense.
I remember I used this device more often before, and it didn't analysed until it got out of the book
Maybe I'm the next Houdini. I think 1.e4 is an error!
Arguably, the Sicilian has been the most effective inaccuracy in the history of chess.
Lol i love the scicilian and so do alot of other people SO SHUT UP COMPUTER!!!
Some computers are worse than others. The chess.com analysis computer needs serious work.
Computers are not stupid, and cannot be stupid, any more than a toaster or a screwdriver could be called stupid. People that program computers can be, however.
Just do not tell a sicilian or he will stab you. And do not look at his daughter.
you're only envious because the belgian defence is 2...b6?! in the King's gambit.
Well, at least there is a Belgian defence. I am struggling to find a Brazilian one.
10/7/2015 - Shulman - Krush, US Championship 2007
by nateeLION 4 minutes ago
Why are women not as successful as men in chess?
by Azukikuru 13 minutes ago
Scorpion Pawn structure?
by aussiedj 15 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by Robert_Philley 17 minutes ago
The Hnerf Attack
by P_or 17 minutes ago
Can you solve this puzzle?
by theusernameistaken 26 minutes ago
by Lagomorph 28 minutes ago
FIDE vs Chess.com ratings explained
by aman_makhija 30 minutes ago
What a bizarre game
by newengland7 33 minutes ago
Did black play this opening ok?
by newengland7 42 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!