14929 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
At our level, openings hardly matter. It's mostly a matter of reaching an equal middlegame and being comfortable (ie knowing your break moves, basic ideas behind the opening).
From what i know about openings, it seems to me like black has equalized here at least, but no glaring tactical or positional disadvantages exist.
I know but for some reason I like the thought of having a bishop on a3
Much stronger than the erroneous placement of the dark square bishop on a3 would be g3 and Bg2 as in a typical KIA setup. But for very fast games (2 minutes and under) it might not be too bad, since the quality of play is lower and opening mistakes are therefore less important. It's up to you.
Or perhaps Bxe7...hehe
I think its good for blitz games, but not in a serious match. Black can answer g6, Bg7, 0-0, Re8, e5, I believe this should be the main idea, inspired from facing benko, where black sacrifies a pawn to place a bishop on a6 and white cant play instantly e4. In our case, black cant play e5, its almost the same.
Please be relevant, helpful & nice!
Thank you for the advice.
1. Nf3 2. b3 has been played by kramnik and some other top gms, although not necessarily with Ba3. it sometimes transposes into a type of english opening. Ba3 with the thought of preventing castling doesn't really work as you might think, as black can fianchetto his dark square bishop and not have any problems. don't listen to anyone here who discounts you so quickly. try it out and if you get crushed its time to move on but if it works keep at it- your rating might go up, and you'll play better players, and eventually you'll probably start getting crushed again, but hey then you can try something new.
No, it's not a good opening. Black can just play 3...g6, 4 ...Bg7, and he is already set up to just play ...Ne4 at some point discovering an attack on the Ra1. But even other ideas are playable because 3 Ba3 doesn't really threaten anything or prepare to threaten anything.
In my database of recent games from master tournaments since 2007, I have nearly 216,000 games. There are 156 with the position here after move 2; NONE played 3 Ba3. That should tell you something.
But it doesn't lose immediately, either. If you are ready for the possible Black responses, it's playable. But "good" is not the word for it.
I have played this opening otb [believe it or not] with the same position as white after Ba3.
Since I lost in 20 moves with my king mated in the centre I have to answer "No". Might be great for Schiller's next UCO though.
No, this is simply not a good opening. You should move another pawn first and then your knight.
You can know if the opening is better by simply looking on master games on that kind of theory. If only few games were noted and all of it were losing games, then I prefer you to not use the opening.
But on blitz game, this can be used as you will sidestep the opening and will cause your opponent onto thinking of opening that he's not aware of. But this must use occasionally.
"Millionaire Chess 2015: Round 1"
Finally a blunder-free game?
by James1011James1011 3 minutes ago
Dvoretsky's Endgame menual < how much dificult?
by ylblai2 4 minutes ago
Block people from a certain nation
by axhed 9 minutes ago
Good game or bad on me?
by chesster3145 9 minutes ago
What is this model?
by KingArs 10 minutes ago
by TurboFish 15 minutes ago
Women in Chess 2015
by zealandzen 16 minutes ago
Game against an FM (lost obviously)
by Borismore 21 minutes ago
10/8/2015 - Tolush - Alatortsev, Moscow 1948
by willhamster 21 minutes ago
No computer can solve this mate in 1, my revenge!!
by enprise689 21 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!