1- the whole idea of the Falkbeer countergambit (2...d5) after 3.exd5 is NOT 3...exf4 but 3...e4, where the pawn seriously cramps White's development (controls e3). Yes, it's a gambit, and yes, you need to know your lines seriously if you don't want to have given a pawn for nothing.
2-I never saw your 3...d5 line, but for sure 5...Nxd5 ? is a lemon. Why hurry to take ? ...Bb4 preparing to castle and pressuring White's center (threat : ...c6, then take on c3, then e4 hangs) looks best to me, and other moves look fine to (...c6, ...Bg4, even ...Nc6 maybe).
Hello I wanted to know, if anyone could give me some recommandations against the King's Bishop Gambit, which I consider slightly more unpleasant than the Knight Gambit?
So far I have tried various Defences. The modern with
3 ... d5, or the main line with 3 ... Nf6 sometimes the slightly dubious 3 ... Qh4+. All those continuations never really convinced me, and I started to try to avoid whole King's Bishop Gambit by playing 2 ... d5.
So I was going through a book, which recommends the Bishop Gambit and look what other ways Black may have against it and found the Duras Defence, which to me seems pretty nice, and now wanted to discuss if this might be an acceptable continuation as Black?
A small summary: