I think the Kings gambit is not dead.The line 1.E4 E5 2.F4 xF4 3.NF3 G5 4.H4 which is the classical line of the Kings gambit.It is the way in which white stands the best chance of winnning.Is there another variation of the Kings gambit that is better or can it transpose into any oter openings.If so what are they.Please give the algebraic notation for them.

I must say , after playing it out on my chess board daniel. it is a marvelous opening  , i thought if they play 4. h4 'h6' , 5.hxg5  and it cannot take back , 5. hxg5 Rxh8 ,  !! if they play 4. h4 f6 5.b3 lets say they play d5 5. Bc2  dxe4  6.Nxg5 again a pawn that cannot take unless they are a begginer , fxg5 Bxh8

lets look at that point wise 5 points black , 6 points white.

the earlier variation i talked about the points break even , but whith white at much better positional advantage ,  and if they take the pawn and you take rook , its 6 points to two . plus an added advantage is white attacking the weak king side very early in the game.

thank you for the post daniel , we shall explore this at school.

i also saw now that the variation of 4. h4 h6 5. h6xg5 , also blocks the Knights main entry into the game  the only other way to play it , would be to the e7 square , , blocking the queen and bishop. once again excellent opening

I really enjoy the King's Gambit.  It's exciting, but you must keep pressure on your opponent for it to work properly.  Sometimes I let it slip into Muzio's Gambit.  That's when the real fun starts.

I don't like 4. h4, I prefer 4. Bc4

AlexanderAlekhineJNR wrote:

I think the Kings gambit is not dead.The line 1.E4 E5 2.F4 xF4 3.NF3 G5 4.H4 which is the classical line of the Kings gambit.It is the way in which white stands the best chance of winnning.Is there another variation of the Kings gambit that is better or can it transpose into any oter openings.If so what are they.Please give the algebraic notation for them.

---

I know a man who likes this line :1.E4 E5 2.F4 xF4 3.NF3 G5 4.H4 g4 5.Ng5 h6 6.Nxf7 ...Allgaier Gambit. end he beat a FM!!!

Here are two other alternative lines in the Kings gambit that i found out. 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d6 3.xe5 xe5 4. Nf3 bg4/Nc6 5.BiB4/BiE2 This results in Ruy Lopez with the F pawn missing for white and the D pawn for black.Qe2+ for white helps to develop pieces but you need to watch out for blocking your bishop on F1.Here is another 1.E4 E5 2.F4 F6 3.XE5 XE5.This line results in a strong kingside attack for both with Nf6/BiC4 resulting in Gianco Piano and Ruy Lopez

 can you make an illustraion of a good variation of play of kings gambit.

6.fxg3 must be the patzer variation. 6.Kf1 is correct, and 7.Bxf7's better than 7.Qxg4.

after bxf7, what will now the next move for white?

4. ..g4 5.0-0!?

http://blog.chess.com/Etienne/muzio-gambit-database

after bxf7, what will now the next move for white?

 

8.Qxg4. The point of Bxf7 is then Black can't answer Qxg4 with g2+, so White is only down a piece for a pawn and doesn't have to resign.

I worked out a trap in the muzio gambit.Here is the algebraic notation.It wins blacks queen and most of blacks other pieces.1.e4 e5 2.f4 xf4 3.nf3 g5 4.Bic4 g4 5.0-0 xf3 6.rxf3 d6 tries to pin the rook on f3 to the queen on D1 7.Rxf4 nc6 goes for development 8.Qh5 goes for Qf7# mate in the next move for white 8..Qe7 prevents fools mate.9.Rxf7 attacking blacks queen.9...Qd8 to save the queen,Anything else would lose him the game.White is not bothered he replies 10.Rf6+.Black prevents Qf7# by playing 10.Kd7.White plays 11.BiE6+.Black can only play his king to e7 so white mates by playing Qf7#

The following article was taken from chesscafe.com

In the summer of 1961, a new chess magazine, the "American
Chess Quarterly," began publication. Edited by Grandmaster
Larry Evans, it was "dedicated to the interests of the
professional chess player." The first issue contained an
article which not only put the magazine on the map, but which
became one of the most famous opening articles ever written.
Eighteen-year old U.S. Champion Bobby Fischer was smarting at
the recent defeat handed him by Boris Spassky at Mar Del Plata.
Bobby had played the Black side of the King's Gambit.

Spassky-Fischer
Mar del Plata
March 30, 1960
King's Gambit Accepted
1 e4 e5 2 f4 ef4 3 Nf3 g5 4 h4 g4 5 Ne5 Nf6 6 d4 d6 7 Nd3 Ne4 8
Bf4 Bg7 9 Nc3 Nc3 10 bc3 c5 11 Be2 cd4 12 O-O Nc6 13 Bg4 O-O 14
Bc8 Rc8 15 Qg4 f5 16 Qg3 dc3 17 Rae1 Kh8 18 Kh1 Rg8 19 Bd6 Bf8
20 Be5 Ne5 21 Qe5 Rg7 22 Rf5 Qh4 23 Kg1 Qg4 24 Rf2 Be7 25 Re4
Qg5 26 Qd4 Rf8 27 Re5 ("Incredibly, Black must lose a piece.
While trying to figure out what was going on in Spassky's head,
I blundered and lost the game!" - Fischer) 27...Rd8 28 Qe4 Qh4
29 Rf4 1-0 [This game is fully annotated by Fischer in "My 60
Memorable Games."]

Perhaps motivated by this loss, Fischer attacked the very
essence of the theory of the King's Gambit.

As a result of this article, the King's Gambit initially
virtually disappeared from grandmaster play. Eventually,
resources were found that rehabilitated the opening and it made
a gradual re-emergence. Nevertheless, the Fischer Defense to
the King's Gambit (as it is now called) still plays a vital
role in Black's treatment of this ancient opening.

We are pleased to present the entire article just as it
appeared thirty years ago (descriptive notation and all). It is
reprinted with the permission of GM Larry Evans.


                    A BUST TO THE KING'S GAMBIT
                  by U.S. Champion Bobby Fischer
                     International Grandmaster

Biographical Sketch of Bobby Fischer

In the winter of 1957 a bombshell burst upon the horizon of the
chess world when 15-year-old Bobby Fischer wrested the United
States National Title from defending Champion Arthur Bisguierg
and Grandmaster Samuel Reshevsky. True, he had previously shown
tremendous talent. He had tied with Bisguier and nosed him out
on a tie-break for the "Open" Title at Cleveland, but many
considered this a "fluke." No flash-in-the-pan, Bobby roundly
consolidated his position as the world's youngest Grandmaster
by winning the United States Title AGAIN in 1958 and AGAIN in
1959-60.

Bobby's international achievements are equally spectacular.
They include a solid second (to World Champion Tal) at the
powerful Zurich Tournament, 1959, and some notable victories
over Keres, Smyslov, Gligorich, Euwe and Unzicker, to name but
a few outstanding European Grandmasters. At Mar Del Plata,
1960, Bobby tied for first with Russia's Boris Spassky - again
ahead of a strong field. At this time of writing [Summer 1961]
Bobby has set off to lead the United States Team in the
Olympics at Leipzig, Germany, and he has recaptured the U.S.
title for the 4th time!

"Bobby Fischer's Best Games of Chess," published by Simon &
Schuster, contains a collection of some fine chess gems by the
youthful author.

                    A Bust to the King's Gambit

The King's Gambit has lost popularity, but not sympathy.
Analysts treat it with kid gloves and seem reluctant to
demonstrate an outright refuatation. "The Chessplayers Manual"
by Gossip and Lipschutz, published in 1874, devotes 237 pages
to this gambit without arriving at a conclusion. To this day
the opening has been analyzed romantically - not
scientifically. Moderns seem to share the same unconscious
attitude that caused the old-timers to curse stubborn Steinitz:
"He took the beauty out of chess."

To the public, the player of the King's Gambit exhibits courage
and derring-do. The gambit has been making a comeback with the
younger Soviet masters, notably Spassky (who defeated
Bronstein, Averbach and myself with it). His victories rarely
reflected the merits of the opening since his opponents went
wrong in the mid-game. It is often the case, also, as with
Santasiere and Bronstein, that the King's Gambit is played with
a view to a favorable endgame. Spassky told me himself the
gambit doesn't give White much, but he plays it because neither
does the Ruy Lopez nor the Giuoco Piano.

The refuatation of any gambit begins with accepting it. In my
opinion the King's Gambit is busted. It loses by force.

1 P-K4 P-K4 2 P-KB4 PxP 3 N-KB3 P-Q3!

This is the key to a troublesome position, a high-class
"waiting move." At Mar Del Plata, 1959, I played 3...P-KN4
against Spassky, but this is inexact because it gives White
drawing chances in the ensuing ending: e.g., 4 P-KR4 P-N5 5
N-K5 N-KB3 6 P-Q4 P-Q3 7 N-Q3 NxP 8 BxP B-N2 and now 9 P-B3!
(replacing Spassky's 9 N-B3) 9...Q-K2 10 Q-K2 B-B4 11 N-Q2
leads to an ending where Black's extra Pawn is neutralized by
White's stranglehold on the dark squares, especially KB4.

Another good try, but also inexact, is the Berlin Defense:
3...P-KR3 4 P-Q4 P-KN4 5 P-KR4 B-N2 6 P-KN3 P-N5 (also playable
is 6...P-Q3 7 PxBP P-N5) 7 N-R2 PxP 8 NxP (8 QxP loses to
8...PxN 9 QxB QxP+ 10 K-Q1 Q-B3) 8...P-Q4 9 P-K5 B-B4 10 B-KB4,
where Black cannot demonstrate any advantage.

Of course 3...P-Q4 equalizes easily, but that's all.

4 B-B4

4 P-Q4 transposes, the only difference if White tries to force
matters after 4...P-KN4 5 P-KR4 P-N5 6 N-N5 (White also gets no
compensation after 6 BxP PxN 7 QxP N-QB3 or 6 N-N1 B-R3)
6...P-KB3! 7 N-KR3 PxN 8 Q-R5+ K-Q2 9 BxP Q-K1! 10 Q-B3 K-Q1
and with his King and Queen reversed, Black wins easily.

4...P-KR3!

This in conjunction with Black's previous move I would like to
call the Berlin Defense Deferred. By this subtle transposition
Black knocks out the possibility open to White in the last note
(to move 3).

5 P-Q4 P-KN4 6 0-0 B-N2 7 P-B3

Necessary to protect the QP. 7 P-KN3 is always met by P-N5.

7...N-QB3

Here there is disagreement as to Black's best move. Puc and
Rabar, Euwe, Keres, and most analysts give the text as the main
line and mention 7...N-K2(!) in passing. I think 7...N-K2 is
best because there is no reason why Black should not strive to
castle K-side: e.g., 8 P-KN3 P-Q4! 9 PxQP PxNP 10 PxP (if 10
N-K5 PxP+! 11 K-R1 0-0 12 P-Q6 QxP wins) 10...0-0 11 Q-N3 Q-Q3
12 K-N2 N-B4 wins. There is little practical experience with
this sub-variation.

8 Q-N3

If 8 P-KN3 P-N5 9 N-R4 P-B6 10 N-Q2, Euwe and other analysts
betray their soft-mindedness toward this opening by giving the
inferior 10...B-B3(?) 11 N(2)xP PxN 12 QxP - "unclear"!! This
is yet another example of sentimental evaluation - after
12...Q-K2 followed by B-R6 and 0-0-0 Black wins easily. The
Pawn on KB6 is a bone in White's throat so why force him to
sacrifice when he must anyway? 10...Q-K2 is the strongest move.

In this last variation (instead of 10 N-Q2) White can vary with
10 Q-N3 but then comes Nimzovitch's beautiful winning line:
10...Q-K2 11 N-B5 BxN 12 PxB (if 12 QxP R-N1 13 QxN+ Q-Q2 14
QxQ+ BxQ and Black has a winning endgame) 12...0-0-0 13 BxP
Q-K7 14 Q-K6+ (if 14 R-B2 NxQP! 15 RxQ PxR wins) 14...R-Q2! 15
R-B2 Q-Q8+ 16 R-B1 Q-B7 17 N-Q2 N-B3 (threatening N-Q1) 18 B-N6
(if 18 Q-N3 QxQ 19 BxQ P-Q4 with a winning endgame) 18...P-Q4
followed by N-K2 with a winning game for Black.

8...Q-K2 9 P-KR4 N-B3

Again theoretical disagreement. Perfectly good is 9...P-N5! 10
BxP (forced, not 10 KN-Q2 NxQP! 11 PxN BxP+ etc.) 10...PxN 11
RxP - given by analysts again as "unclear," but after N-B3
followed by 0-0, White has nothing for the piece.

10 PxP PxP 11 NxP NxKP

A wild position, but Black is still master.

12 BxP+

The game is rife with possibilities. If 12 NxN QxN 13 RxP Q-K8+
14 R-B1 Q-R5 15 BxP+ K-Q1 16 Q-Q5 N-K4! 17 PxN BxP (threatening
B-R7 and mate) 18 R-Q1 Q-N6 wins, owing to the threat of R-R8+.

12...K-Q1 13 NxN

Not 13 N-K6+ BxN 14 QxB QxQ 15 BxQ NxQP!

13...QxN 14 BxP

14 RxP also loses to 14...Q-K8+ 15 R-B1 R-R8+ 16 KxR QxR+ 17
K-R2 QxQB etc.

14...NxP

And Black wins...

Of course White can always play differently, in which case he
merely loses differently. (Thank you, Weaver Adams!)
===============================================================
This is the Fisher vs Spassky game that started all the trouble.