12109 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I like to play the King's Gambit and I often get positions that I am happy with but when the game goes into the Kieseritsky gambit I often end up with a bad positions. When black plays 3. ...g5 I have the option to avoid the Kieseritsky for the Muzio gambit.
I get the feeling that Muzio gambit could be pretty difficult for black if he isent too familiar with it.
Wich variation do you people prefer? Wich one is easier to play? Wich one is considerd to be better theoreticly?
If you can get good compensation for the sac'd knight, the Muzio Gambit is one of thee best variations of the KG.
I ended up choosing the Muzio Gambit quite a while back for the very reason you are considering it now. In my opinion, the Muzio Gambit is a reasonable practical choice, given that it is difficult to defend so precisely. However, I will likely soon be giving up 4.Bc4 (and likely, the King's Gambit altogether), not because I ran into problems with the Muzio - but because I never found myself in a Muzio! Admittedly, the sample size is small, but every time my opponent has been invited to play 4...g4, he/she has instead opted for 4...Bg7, with a Hanstein Gambit being the result.
I have tried for a while to play around with the Hanstein to see if there is something there for White, but unfortunately, it looks like White is either down a pawn for insufficient compensation, or White regains the pawn but gets a difficult game while Black calls the shots. Obviously, I am no master, so perhaps there are things I missed in my analysis and in my games, but it seems to me that the dreadfully boring sqeeze that Black can put on White in the Hanstein makes the entire line unworthwhile.
So if you do end up choosing the Muzio, remember to keep 4...Bg7 in mind as well. Otherwise, I'd stick with the Kieseritzky, or even switch out of the King's Gambit altogether. I'll miss the King's Gambit, but it'll be for the better if it means not having to play the Hanstein again.
I like the Kieseritzky except that the name is hard to spell!
"Your Games Analyzed hosted by WGM Tatev Abrahamyan"
Best Chess.com members.
by Whip_Kitten a few minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Chess Champions
by wikipedia1286 5 minutes ago
How should I have advanced the pawns in this position?
by ponz111 6 minutes ago
Why do Sicilian players hate 2.c3?
by Fiveofswords 8 minutes ago
Can you really become a class A player by studying tactics?
by bb_gum234 12 minutes ago
7/7/2015 - Execution Of The Attack
by monkeync 15 minutes ago
by Martin_Stahl 18 minutes ago
My loss to a 2007 OTB
by ManeuverMaster 19 minutes ago
Repertiore against the Dragon & Accelerated Dragon
by J-H-D 26 minutes ago
In Memory of knightspawn5
by Conflagration_Planet 30 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!