16020 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I now play and enjoy King's Gambit, especially the one derived from the Vienna Game. Nine times out of ten, I have an exciting and tactical game (or just take advantage when my opponent makes a blunder). Right now, I feel confident that King's Gambit is a valid opening and should be paid special attention to, like how the d pawn game is focused mostly on queen's gambit.
A friend of mine tells me that falkbeer countergambit annihiliates king's gambit, and moreover, another person tells me that 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3.exd5 exf4 is better for black. Can anyone give me feedbacks on this? I am an amateur, but I think King's Gambit is very solid if backed with overturning tactics.
Thanks in advance.
It's not "better for Black", but just one of the many ways to get a comfortable game (close to equal) with Black against the king's gambit.
oh, thank you! So as long as white, who has the initiative here, plays concretely, there should be no problem?
And is KG derived from Vienna Game better? For example:
Thank you for your response!
There is no "better" or "worse"- and via the Vienna move order white cannot force a king's gambit - e.g. 2...Nf6 3.f4 d5 is IMO good for Black, who is playing for a win with minimal risk (provided he does know what he is doing, of course).
Oh, that makes sense. Sorry for pestering about "good" and "bad". Thank you again.
I also play the King's Gambit in Blitz. I think it's an excellent opening for average players because it creates lots of piece activity and tactical opportunities which leads to an exciting game. I don't think the Falkbeer has caused me any more problems than other Black responses. At my lowly level, the better tactical player tends to win whatever variation is employed.
how about in tournaments?
I always hate it when my opponent plays 2..Bc5 in the King's Gambit, because it doesn't guaruntee me quick tactics.
The King's Gambit is one of those openings like the Trompowsky where White can generate a lot of play if Black isn't well-prepared to meet it, but if Black has done his homework it becomes hard to find.
Over time, such openings forfeit a good number of opportunities to play White by giving away the best chances for advantage. They are better suited as surprise weapons tucked away in a balanced répertoire than as main lines.
I see... I guess I should limit it. Thanks for the feedback!
How'd you great chess players get so great?
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 9 minutes ago
Doubt On the Use of Computers
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 14 minutes ago
by eastyz 19 minutes ago
by bouloux 28 minutes ago
Human vs computer in a blitz game
by RobertoPericle 32 minutes ago
log out button
by PHudson 33 minutes ago
In need of advice for online tournament the 32nd Chess.com <1000
by RSK_Asherz 35 minutes ago
by Rosheen-Dove 41 minutes ago
French Defence - Rubinstein Variation
by TwoMove 50 minutes ago
by Nipplewise 55 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!