11895 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I've recently begun studying openings, and I have a bit of a quandry. I can find a wealth of material on what moves to make against standard opening replies, but I don't see much about taking advantage of weak moves. Some options, like forks and such, are obvious, but I'm thinking of situations where the advantage is more subtle. Are there any resources that talk about what to do in your opening when your opponent gives you an opportunity?
These are positional advantages.
That is where BIG databases are handy. You not only get the good play, but also the bad, and hopefully what to do about it.
But sometimes you just got to wing it....
BTW, a big mistake, imo, is to try to punish a bad move. If you can figure out why it's bad, see if you can take advantage (more subtle than punish!) There is rarely a one move refutation.
I just simply make the right moves. If my opponent pushes a and h pawns, I takeover the center.
I just lost a game to 1.a4. How should have I answered that bad opening move?
HOW DARE YOU!!!! in bullet those opening are for real masters! They are ment to confuse oponent rally fast and to devastate him! I play that and i reched 2400!
Well, answer my question, Genius! Thanks.
You lost that game not because he played a4, a5, a6, but because you hung two pieces in the opening. If you hang pieces like that you can lose to basically anything. The only thing his early pawn push did was waste time, and you correctly seized the center. But you really needed to get castled kingside instead of moving the queen's knight. Then he'd have had quite a foolish looking position.
Bojan, thanks for game #1. I don't understand what the other two games have to do with 1.a4. I need you to answer my question (what to reply to 1.a4?) because you are the expert 2386. My modest 1700+ person needs concrete answers. Can you be so kind to post two or three of your games or to give me some on the board pointers? Respectfully,yours.
You completely ignored the one person who gave you the best possible advice. It doesn't matter if Kasparov gives you a 10-move variation that will gain a significant edge over White after 1.a4, if you hang two pieces before move 15 you're going to lose every time.
The OP's question vastly overestimates the importance of openings. An opponent playing a bad opening that doesn't lose material tactically is handing you a small advantage, nothing more.
In his book Chess Openings: Theory and Practice, Horowitz had a concept of the "ideal variation". In the ideal variation the opponent never made a move to stop the basic idea of the opening. I found this concept very helpful in dealing with non-book moves. I don't think this concept caught on. At least I know of no other books that uses this concept. Nunn will occasionly use something similiar, he will give a variation where the opponent makes a pointless move (usually something like a6) to illustrate a threat.
The real killer with silly opening moves is the loss of time. By making good opening moves you gain time to develop your attack while your opponent is wasting time shoring up self-inflicted weaknesses.
If your opponent deviates from a main line with a weak move, it creates a weakness in their position. You will usually have to deviate from the mainline and be creative in order to take advantage of this weakness. Don't just memorize lines without knowing their exact purpose! If you know what move they should have played you can think to yourself, "what does the correct move accomplish on the board that this wrong one doesn't?". If you can answer that question then you will be in good shape.
Excellent article, thanks!
White can get away with playing moves like 1. h3 or a4 and often gets a psychological advantage if black thinks he must be able to punish white. Black should be able to equalize, but he certainly can't force a winning position. When I play against this stuff I just try to control the center and develop my pieces. If anything I'm more on guard and try not to overextend.
Its unfortunate but White can afford to waste time like this in the opening...As Hollywood said, White might not get an edge but there is NO way to refute any opening like this, or any FIRST opening move for white. For black its another story, moving 1....h6 might give him a miserable position but even then i don't think there is any "one move" refutation to these kinds of shenanigans. You just play classical and straight-foward and in the critical moment the enemy may sorely miss that one extra tempo he wasted in the opening.
The best way to "punish" bad opening moves is not to try to punish them at all, so much as to exploit the weakesses that they create in the opponent's position. The way to do this, of course, is to strengthen your own position by adhering to sound opening principles. I've learned by bitter experience not to try to "punish" an opponent that plays cockeyed opening moves. One can easily wind up tying onesself into knots and hanging pieces or making other mistakes that the opponent will then use to punish YOU.
To punish bad moves, you need to understand why the moves are bad. Answer the question yourself and you can find the answer yourself. Its necessary to understand theideas behind the opening to play the opening with any degree of success against the prepared and those who deviate.
1. e4 vs 1. d4
by lcmil a few minutes ago
by ChessCamper a few minutes ago
by belue a few minutes ago
QG - Tarrasch vs Albin Counter Gambit
by FromMuToYou a few minutes ago
Post your game for expert analysis
by Ryanyurocks10 4 minutes ago
If You were Doing Life Which 5 Books Would You Keep To Make Your game Strong?
by arthurprior 5 minutes ago
Who is better Paul Morphy or Magnus Carlsen
by Spiritbro77 9 minutes ago
12/6/2013 - Mate in 8
by neanderthalhuck 9 minutes ago
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by FromMuToYou 12 minutes ago
1st choice in a Chess Program @Amazon
by Sangwin 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!