11019 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Now i'm looking for ways to refute the stonewall dutch
Um mm lol that ain't hapnin
I need to find a way to show black's e5 weakness in a concrete line, along with f3 e4 breakthroughs by white
THE SLAV, THE QGD, AND THE GRUNFELD WERE ALL REFUTED ACCORDING TO ANAND, ARONIAN, KRAMNIK, AND CARLSEN WHO SHOWED THAT WHITE HAS A FORCED WIN IN THE GRUNFELD AND BIG ADVANTAGES IN THE OTHER OPENINGS. ALSO THE ALAPIN WAS REFUTED BY THESE SUPER GRANDMASTERS
The Slav is extremely popular at the moment.... As is the Grunfeld. But okay.
I'm not going to claim "refute", but I always get an EXCELLENT GAME as Black using the Chicago Defense! The key is don't develop the Bishop to e7 and allow the 12.Na4 garbage. Against the "Main Line", Black should play the 7 pawn moves, Nc6, Ra7, Rd7, and either 11...Na5 (my preference) or 11...Bb7. Both are fine for Black, and it's sheerly a matter of personal taste as to why I prefer 11...Na5.
I really liked the Chicago defense for black in the Smith-Morra, and I've played it several times in the past.
But white can play an early Be3, and then Ra7 is not possible.
I think in Euwe's book (The Middlegame 1) shows how to play against the Dutch Stonewall properly without tricks.
the smith morra gambit is pretty good but not as good as the good old reliable 2. Nf3 according to this paper:
There is a misunderstanding in this thread as to the chess definition of refute.Refute doesn't mean,one's game becomes more difficult,in chess "refute" means one's winning chances are few to none,draws are still very possible but essentially one has no chance of winning.The side playing a refuted line is essentially passing on the oppertunity to win and will struggle for a draw.
I've never lost to the KID even against a 2435. (who i beat) However, due to the massive complexity of the main line, I will be wrong
in some cases.
It seems that even the great ajian can lost when playing against the KID http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=82360306
What animal would make the best chess player?
by kiwi a few minutes ago
Stephen Hawking: 'Girls are bad at chess'
by Ziggy_Zugzwang 4 minutes ago
7/26/2014 - Saonina-Tjekova 1980
by SaiKrishna_K 13 minutes ago
Does fate (or destiny) plays significant role in the success of Carlsen?
by kleelof 13 minutes ago
Ruth Haring: 'Girls are bad at chess'
by RG1951 18 minutes ago
Tactics Trainer Problem Difficulty
by TomHaegin 26 minutes ago
IM Arnold Denker won in 7 moves.His next move is 2.????
by Chesscoaching 31 minutes ago
Can someone please identify this opening? (beginner question)
by CJ_P 40 minutes ago
How many USCF national master are there?
by ashikuzzaman 41 minutes ago
Who are you supporting in the upcoming rematch b/w Anand and Carlsen ?
by Tactical_Fight 51 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!