ChessTrainor and Na3 invades a new chess site.

I hope my critics would not think i made up this site or invented it ,only the A00>Tapel -Tomas Opening.

5th game CT(1516) vs gkHande/India (1516) 14moves win.1-0 June 30,2009(Tue)

4th game CT(1478) vs joe3000/ UK (1409) 33 moves mate.1-0June 29,2009(Mon)

3rd game CT(1463) vs zubin/India (1623)29 moves mate.1-0 June 28,2009(Sun)

2nd game CT(1427) vs jon zion/Canada (1488) 18moves mate.1-0 June27,2009(Sat)

1st game CT(1400) vs BTSE/ Australia (1304) 24 moves mate.1-0June26,2009(Fri)

5th game CT(1516) vs gkHande/India (1516) 14moves win.1-0 June 30,2009(Tue)

Another man's garbage is another man's treasure... but ultimately means u treasure garbage. congrats on giving us a crappy opening.

Please give proper analysis instead of throwing your stupid games at us. If you want us to think its good then annotate ALL your games and tell us why it was a good move.

"Another man's garbage is another man's treasure. Congratulations, enjoy your garbage."

"Crappy unless proven ok"

"Downright bad, upleft sucky"

Oh and stop being so racist. If he is american, then whats wrong with being american? I am a filipino engineer working in singapore (although i was born here in '87) and i think u bring shame to our country. Everyone can lose, proving 2 points. 1, if that american guy lost, then he lost cuz he lost, cuz he played badly rather than cuz of ur opening. 2, all ur opponents were probably patzers or just having a bad day, they lost cuz they lost.

If u can say why Na3 is good rather than showing us games in which people almost purposely lose, it is Crappy until proven ok :D

He's gonna just keep posting stupid games and insulting us because he doesn't have that analysis. You can obviously sometimes win games but because you don't have any good explanation of the logic of your moves I can only assume you lose more of them or you're not playing people good enough. To beat someone 2000+ with this opening followed by like c3 and h4, you have to get lucky. I wonder what you would say if you lost to me with that opening. I play tons of chess, and I also critisize bad moves that people claim are good for stupid reasons like winning a game with it once in a while.

Then let's play ,your a very talkative youngster at age 15,still alot of experience you need,are you already circumcise?.To me you are but a novice talker,even a novice chessplayer.i can make u shut by my play.Lets go five minutes.i just proven thrice many cheaters are your countryman and i can show and prove it because i record doubtful wins of my opponents.i record their games.iToday i just recorded two games.same

I hope you dont call your countryman stupid,having a rating of 1523 of the USA,defeated in just 8 moves,just now!

12.ChessTrainor(1705) vs Obie won/USA(1523) [1-0] 8 moves win,resign on the 8th move coz Queen is captured!He said wow!then resigns 1-0 .

site:chess.com/date:July 3,2009(Friday)Time In Phils.

1. He blundered. You didnt win because of the opening choice. No one does. In fact, there is no "opening idea" with it.

2. Stop being so racist. If i called a nigger u wouldnt like it. You shame all Filipinos. My family will be sad to here about u...

Ironic that someone who can give zero explanation, while insulting everybody he speaks to, is supposed to be a "Chess Trainor" [sic].

Bobby Fischer didn't explain his move or opening ideas as well.Shoul we scorn him?

But he didn't try to convince people how good a move like Na3 is. That's a pretty big difference. And you're much, much worse than fischer. Do you just train your students to believe you just because they're not as good as you?

omg he is a chess coach ? well if you are, how would you explain this move to the students ? All the games you have been showing they were quick game were they, like 5 or 10 mins game right ? if that the case then that explain some of the opponent's blunders.

Then why did u hide when i challenge u,r u just a talker of nonsense,are u vey afraid.Why comment to the opening u cannot even beat.ChessTrainor

Really, I hope children don't pay you to teach them moves with no analysis and theory. Chess.com ratings are inflated perhaps until the 2200's I suppose.

Beating people in quick games although valid doesn't provide sound evidence that the the opening gives 90% winning chance. SUppose a player is prepared for the opening, I believe the games would be different.

I still don't see proof of where the move Na3 wins, as most of the games you won were due to blunders and checkmate and perhaps nohing to do with Na3. If you provide proof, I think you could "launch" this openong in a better light.

If u are a chess coach, parents, children and ur clients have all been scammed U should be arrested. Fischer is better than u btw.

His book "My 60 Memorable Games" is the most famous chess book in existence, because of its wonderful explanations.

Back to you.

I'll play you in correspondence or long live. I didn't say I wouldn't play you but 5 min is about the only time your move is ok. 5 minute does not require a full understanding of chess so that wouldn't prove anything. In fact, even beating me in any time control wouldn't prove anything, but I'd do it anyway. But you thought I was going to cheat when I challenged you. Maybe because my rating is high at 14?

In the first game the Knight on a3 didn't appear to have any affect on the game.

All you have done is convert into the London System. You play 1. Na3 because your opponents defend with positions that won't work against the London System. If they were to do so, your opening would have no punch to it. The most I can say for this is that it may be an easy way to open your b-file with BxNa3 bxBa3, but pawns do better when their captures are centripetal. Also, How about presenting some games where the opening loses? Are you afraid to? No opening is perfect.

Ok, maybe moving your Knight to a3 allows for some maneuvers in the first row. But you never used that extra space in many of your games.

So it's really just a gambit variation of the London or the Bird where for Na3 to be of any use Black must capture the Knight with his bishop? And why would black long castle? The bishop that captures the Knight is on the kingside. After 3. Nf6, black can already castle kingside. Any flank attacks, which are common in Bird and London, can simply be met by counter action the center, which should be easy because w/ 1. ...d5 Black leads in center control from the onset.