15803 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Grunfeld is better and changed in the last 30 years...
Playing what? The NimzoIndian Defense? The Nimzovitch Defense or the NimzoLarsen Attack? Or any one of a dozen or so Nimzovitch Variations not to mention the Advance and Winawer Variations in the French, both of which should also be named after him but aren't I guess because so many other variations are in the CKD, Sicilian, RL, Philidor etc. are.
I guess the question is about 1.e4 Nc6, the nimzowitch defense?
Players much stronger than myself play this regularly, so i guess it must be a respectable defense overall, but black has some practical problems. The main one is that as far as i know 2.Nf3 is a rather frustrating response. The recognized best move is 2...e5, but then why starting with 1...Nc6 to traspose to 1...e5? that would mean giving white extra options (2.d4) without having something (ok, you avoid a couple of respectable gambits) in return. Other moves have been tryed, but theoretically white is better.
If you are ready to meet 2.Nf3 with e5 (or if you think that you found another respectable option), then it's time to study 2.d4 d5, where black has to play with great precision but seems to get a playable game. It's not a defense for the faint-hearted, but you might score well with it after careful study, expecially since (as often happens for this sort of offbeat lines) published theory often contains mistakes and a "prepared" white player might rush right into an unexpected novelty.
Personally speaking 2.Nf3 always prevented me from adopting this defence, but there is nothing terribly wrong with it.
grunfeld is better. Lost track..but back again with muliple variations.
I highly recommend A Complete Defense for Black by Raymond Keene and Byron Jacobs. The book proposes a repertoire that is based upon playing 1...Nc6 against any first move by White.
After 1 e4 Nc6 2 Nf3, Keene and Jacobs recommend 2...d6.
Choosing between London System and Queen s' Gambit?
by josephindiaw a few minutes ago
Basic Principles of Chess Openings
by josephindiaw 2 minutes ago
by Alvin_Cruz 3 minutes ago
by mcris 3 minutes ago
by KingOfTheAnimals 6 minutes ago
11/25/2015 - Cat And Mouse
by adityanileshpotdar 10 minutes ago
Refutation to the Ruy Lopez
by Prologue1 19 minutes ago
Numbers beside the moves.
by skotheim2 22 minutes ago
player aborted game and I didn't win?
by s3v4ns 28 minutes ago
by notmtwain 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!