10942 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Yes my point is, those rules of the opening apply to a certain idealogy, if you call it, of chess. The ones you are refering to, the most common, involve development, king safety, and controlling the center. However there are others. There is matrix as I already mentioned, and let's use hypermodernism as an example. They don't develope pieces to control the center. They do things like fianchettos to control the center from the flanks. If you plan on becoming a better chess player, you need to learn there are different systems from what you believe in.
Also, another point is that openings, even at the highest level, aren't the entire game. Your knowledge of book openings is irrelevant if you make simple tactical errors in the mid and endgame. I could walk into a game with an IM, have an entire opening explorer with me, and get smoked after 20 moves. A knowledge of openings doesn't make one an IM. There is more to chess than openings.
dude, that is like not cool Bankwell
anyway, I would like to challange The_Gavinator to a parham challange, I take black of course
Bankwell, what's ironic is that you are rated less than 200 points higher than me.
One thing I like to do is play engine tournaments with some of the strongest free engines out there. Often times my engines dont have books, and just calculate from move 1. Often times I see them play the mov e below. It looks terrible to me, so my question is, why would they play it?
Computers don't play chess in the sense that humans play chess. They calculate lines and rank them with their evaluation algorithm.
Why would developers spend so much time and effort? Either for prestige in a high rank on the program list, or possibly for money if they're going to sell their program.
So openings are ignored, the tests are run with opening books. All evaluations are fine tuned for middlegame positions. What they prefer without an opening book is meaningless, it's not a position it was designed to evaluate.
make it a forum game id like to participate jet
bankwell you have 10 minutes to edit/delete your comment or I will delete you.
And yes I know there are more to chess than openings, but if you know openings better then whos to say an advantage out of it is bad? its not the whole game, but just like the middlegame and endgame it is still a part of chess
thanks wafflemaster that makes sense
I understand that openings are an important part of chess, however, I don't believe having one's mind an opening book would necessarily make them better at chess. Until at least a master level, the midgame is really the deciding factor.
an openings book isnt good, you need to understand the ideas/strategies behind openings, not just moves or you will be dropped off in the middlegame with no idea what to do
And as amateurs, I don't believe we understand all of the theory behind these openings.
I do because I read books and learned
LOL... Even GMs haven't mastered all of their openings...
The more you know, the more you can get out of a book. I don't think you've reached your limit on understanding openings ChristianSoldier.
Gavinator do you accept my challange
ah sorry for the misunderstand of course I dont understand everything lol! I more or less mastered the Ruy Lopez closed and a little bit less of the dragon yugoslav, but I do have a fairly brief knowledge of most existing openings. Right now I'm focusing on the Sicilian, specificaly the dragon
I will pwn all of you with the parham so i dont want to hear this crap anymore about how it is bad. Chess principles are dumb anyway. I never studied one opening and i was 3rd in the nation in 2nd grade, was 5th grade state champion (A while ago) and i pwn all of you. Until you are around 1900-2000 you dont need to study openings, you need to learn to play well.
excuse: oh i lost not because of the opening but because of tactics.
good moves= good positions = good tactical chances.
2. Qh5 questionable move= questionable position = questionable tactics
when you change your attitude you will improve past 1400. blah blah excuse blah blah Matrix blah blah
While Parham was at one time a master he is now 2000. He had a flair for the attack and it begs one to wonder what he could have achieved if he was serious instead of trying to do something just for the same of being different.... its crap... he had a chance to play it against a 2300 master and what did he play? Mainline caro! whimp coward, or wait maybe he had a moment of lucidity and faced reality ,...
This just proves it, he lost because he didnt play the parham. 1.e4 e5 2. Qh5 = automatic win for white.
it is not an automatic win for white, it gives black way too much
Really, like what?
quick easy development, and tempo once the Bc4 threat has been dealt with, and a nice center once white finishes having his queen chased around.
"Reykjavik Open, Final Round | Commentary by FM Ingvar Johannesson & Fiona Steil-Antoni"
Curious thing happened in live chess
by piotr a few minutes ago
3/12/2014 - Forcing The Way Through
by milray101 3 minutes ago
New live board colors
by piotr 3 minutes ago
Is there any defense against pathetic players?
by Meadmaker 6 minutes ago
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by ConnorMacleod_151 15 minutes ago
Don't give the bishop free
by Breakthrough_Man 16 minutes ago
Need help getting "good" at chess!!!
by hicks83 22 minutes ago
What's this Nonsense about 200 Bans maximum?
by ProfessorProfesesen 23 minutes ago
java computer doesn't work
by IndigenousSpirit 24 minutes ago
New olympiad type match that I played in.
by itsmedaniel 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!