9850 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
BTW Gavinator, Na5 is the mainline, it attacks the bishop on c4 giving black a very nice game later, this is why you dont see the fried liver. and just because a move hangs a pawn doesn't mean it is bad. there may be a reason for hangging the pawn
I know Na5 is better, then you do Bb5+, why don't you actually play the lines?
Also, to bguigz, I know, and yet people like jetfighter and christiansoldier and jetfighter don't listen, I have been trying to tell them that this whole time.
After 5...Na5 white is up a pawn.
Sure it is. Even an idiot can see that...
6.Bb5+ c6 or 6...Bd7 are just little techical nuances, they shouldn't be a problem for a player of your caliber.
6 Bb5+ c6 7. dxc6 bxc6, and white is up a pawn.
I just learned the lines I know so I can get to a playable middle game, not so that I would be more booked up than anyone, also Na5 was the extent of my knowledge. proving that I don't go 15/20 moves deep.
I see that does make sence, but doesn't black have an easier time developing, plus I would play 7. Nxc6 for the sake of development and so I can castle to safety latter and unpin the knight
Than you just do Bc4 dummy and that was useless playing Na5.
Sure he is. And after 8.Be2 h6 9.Nf3 e4 10.Ne5 Bd6 11.d4 exd 12.Nxd Qc7 13.h3 0-0, he's still up a pawn, and is still in the mainline. But black has five pieces developed to white's two, and a plus score at the GM level.
Just because one like goes 13 moves deep into theory and looks bad for white, doesn't mean that you can call the fried liver bad...
I am tired of arguing against the parham and the fried liver, I want to go against it the real way, play a game vs me. also I want to prove that the KG isn't refuted just because you give up a pawn and open your kingside. it has merrit. I will play the King's Gambit vs. anyone
lol the fried liver is awesome, I'd play it if there wasn't guioco piano
..plus I would play 7. Nxc6 for the sake of development and so I can castle to safety latter and unpin the knight
...and after 8.BxN+ bxB, blacks queenside pawns are not looking too good.
10/2/2014 - Judit Polgar - Artashes Minasian, Batumi, 1999
by dave4420 a few minutes ago
Kasparov on Stupidity
by idreesarif 22 minutes ago
by ghostofmaroczy 33 minutes ago
Ashley's Million-dollar chess tourney - but bring your own clocks
by edmundich 34 minutes ago
[COMPLiMENTS]: Blocking players after they leave 1 nice note on your wall?
by RonaldJosephCote 36 minutes ago
10/1/2014 - Mate in 3 Again
by MeeTristan 41 minutes ago
9/1/2014 - Mate in 2
by sato_au 48 minutes ago
Studying the Semi-Slav
by ghostofmaroczy 52 minutes ago
FIDE Grand Prix - Baku 2014
by SilentKnighte5 53 minutes ago
by BillPhilip 57 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!