Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Opening Theory...

Jump to forum:
 
12th September 2009, 06:53am
#1
by Helipacter
Asturias Spain
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 239

Hi,

I've got a query regarding opening theory. I've been keeping tabs on a couple of tournaments recently (via blogs), and the commentators state that the games are still in theory at move No "X", or the opening line has been proved a draw by theory, etc., my question is, how do the commentators keep track of all opening theory? How do they also spot a novelty?

To me, it seems that there are so many opening theories that the bloggers must use websites/books etc to help, I'm just wondering which ones they are?

Any advice would be appreciated, as I'm trying to expand my opening theory knowledge...

12th September 2009, 07:02am
#2
by kco
Perth Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 23212

They use database of opening.

12th September 2009, 07:08am
#3
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 14429

I don't think any openings have been proven draws -- they might be drawish, which means they tend to lead to a high proportion of draws at the highest level but a draw is definitely not certain even with best play.

12th September 2009, 07:34am
#4
by Helipacter
Asturias Spain
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 239
TheGrobe wrote:

I don't think any openings have been proven draws -- they might be drawish, which means they tend to lead to a high proportion of draws at the highest level but a draw is definitely not certain even with best play.


What I'm thinking of are comments like this (from this year's Donostia page):

"Leader Nakamura took a DIY rest day in San Sebastian after running out to an incredible 4.5/5 start. He played a forced drawing line of the Najdorf against one of his two closest pursuers, Ruslan Ponomariov."

The article continues:

(Play can continue if White wants, but there is also a forced repetition they didn’t bother to play out.)

I would like to hope that there's no such thing as a drawing line either, but that doesn't seem to be the way

Here's the game in question:

12th September 2009, 07:40am
#5
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 14429

I think that at the level you and I play any of those "drawish" openings are quite winnable.  I wouldn't worry too much about the analysis of how these games tend to come out at the top levels of the game.

12th September 2009, 09:28am
#6
by Helipacter
Asturias Spain
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 239
TheGrobe wrote:

I think that at the level you and I play any of those "drawish" openings are quite winnable.


Ha ha! How very true... I think the chances of me calling a draw 14 moves into a game are incredibly slim...

18th February 2010, 11:02am
#7
by duganp
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg United States
Member Since: Feb 2010
Member Points: 1

I think part of the answer is to use references like Chessbase (http://www.chessbase.com/shop/product.asp?pid=476).  For a mere 350 euros you get millions of games, frequent updates from the latest tournaments, etc.  I don't know when an opening line becomes formally classified as "theory", but perhaps it's when a sufficient number of top-level players have used it successfully.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.