15352 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I know it's a really uncompromising, and I like that. It must be sound because it is seen at top level nowadays.
But surely its wretched pawn structure makes it really daunting to learn.
I would like opinions on how hard it is to "master" it to play it at around 2000 level (rating I'm hoping to accomplish in 1-2 years). Would I drive myself crazy learning theory or would it be fairly intuitive to play once you get the hang of it?
In other words, is it worth the effort to learn it or is it just too complicated to use it effectively at expert level?
I like playing the Najdorf, and I have a love-hate relationship with it. The practical drawbacks I see in the Najdorf is that first you have to learn a ton of variations (Bg5, Bc4, Be3, Be2 are just the main systems, plus g3, h3, f4); plus white is given pretty much free rein (especially against e6-d6 setup) to throw everything at me. His moves come natural, while I have to defend accurately and if I do a single slip-up I instantly lose.
Is the Sveshnikov plagued by these two things, or not?
With my limited experience it seems to me that at least I get some initiative right away, and maybe there aren't that many variations to learn? (the main ones being only two, 9.Bxf6 and 9.Nd5 am I correct?)
Any comment will be much appreciated.
And if somebody wants to play some game with it (either online or live standard) I would be really happy to do it.
Sveshnikov can be cruel. As black you must know a lot of critical lines. A friend (ELO 2000) played with white against another 2000 rated player in a team match. He took the pawn on b5 (a well known bishop sacrifice), but his opponent didn't knew any theory about it. Black was smashed down after 10 moves...
Sveshnikov is comparatively easier and probably slightly more drawish than the Najdorf. There's some theory in some lines, but the ideas are easier than in the Najdorf.
Certainly an ok choice as a 'bring me to 2000 elo' opening.
My teacher told me that GMs don't typically play the Sveshnikov in open Swiss tournaments against lower rated players, because it is too drawish - the path to a draw for white is straightforward and only requires memorization. No room for the GM to play to their class, so to speak.
Sveshnikov is okay if you learn the critical lines of course. But the one thing you have to do is keep the initiative going because by pawn structure black will be worse due to the hole on d5. So if you don't play actively you'll get crushed.
Bad bug in code?
by JMB2010 3 minutes ago
beginner learning: How much do the details matter?
by coffeethyme 4 minutes ago
by DavidIreland3141 10 minutes ago
Proposal for a "Gentlemen" setting
by Steen008 10 minutes ago
11/25/2015 - Cat And Mouse
by KennyLingus 13 minutes ago
by Martin_Stahl 15 minutes ago
want to get insulted for free ?
by DavidIreland3141 17 minutes ago
Refutation to the Ruy Lopez
by NajdorfPoisonedPawn 19 minutes ago
Yes I " Might " disable chat
by etc2000chess 19 minutes ago
What would be the rating of a top chess player in the late 1800s today
by yureesystem 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!