8422 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
So he just wanted it to sound fancy because he happens to have a background in mathematics? heh.
I think he was taking college level physics. Eboard, is there a specific formula, is it judgementally based, is there anywhere I can get a detailed description?
I don't think physics would help much with coming up with a math based method of playing chess. He'd have to be into pure mathematics for something that original.
Yes, I am interested in this too. I know he uses a version of vector analysis, which involves the queen and supporting pieces. Jetfighter, I recall you saying you're in algebra II, so I doubt you know vectors. They are essentialy a way of plotting line segments, you learn about them in trig. Apart from that, I don't know much about it.
I took Physics last year, and other than the stuff about Newton, all I remember are vectors.
I'm not sure, it obviously worked for him however.
Well at least we know it's not horrible. But you can't argue for its merits this way because:
One, you can't know how much he uses it in his games, only that he promotes it (unless you get very clear about matrix chess and go over his games).
Two, assuming he only uses his system during his games, you can't know how good he would have been if he had used a traditional method.
Third, there are many players better than him, so even if this maximized his personal ability, you can't assume it will work for you, or discount the traditional methods that have made the current top 10 who they are.
its not college level physics, just draw the pattern of a queen, then draw the diamond shape of the knight, if a 6yr old understands, its not that hard. no magic fotmula involved at all, were was the piece was at to were it is know
he WAS a chess master over 20 years ago now he is lucky to hold 2000 due to a rating floor. Looking at his tournament history he drops games to class players on a consistant basis. To prove his theory it needs results in tournament play seems to have failed on that. I assume your a student of his and he does seem to have strong personality and appeals to those that like things differet for the sake of being different.
That's funny you'd say that since he is a chess master...
His best FIDE rating was some 1860, so no, he shouldn't be called "a Master". This rating is low even for candidate master level players.
I have found a game of his in Chessbase which started (Parham was white) 1.e4 d5 2.e5 Bf5 3.g4. I'd rather expect a patzer playing like that, not a "master".
matrix isnt just Qh5, if it was then jean dean, emeory Tate wouldnt become masters.
there is nothing wrong with e4 d5 e5 bf5 g4 for NM level.
Oh no, nothing wrong. It just shows he does not understand chess.
2.e5 is just suspect, and 3.g4 is just silly. Other than that, yeah, it's NM level chess.
what are the moves for this strategy?
Huh? The game Zatonskih- Kats is totally irrelevant. It was a Catalan Ukrainian variation (by transposition), where Black was simply not booked (9...b6 is known to give Black a good game).
Maybe you are referring to some other game?
Yes, he does have a plan: weakening his kingside for nothing. Great plan, really.
it weakens his kingside but at least he can castle q side or something.
I assumed that was the only point of the Parham.
it amazes me to see more people downgrade someone who one they havent played, but good note to see someone leave a comment about playing parham and losing to but learned from it, if it weakens the king side prove your theory
Currently my FIDE rating is just 515 points higher than mr. Parham's, and I have teached a few Grandmasters how to play the game.
Do I have to prove anything at all?
And besides that, the comment went on the comment about another stupid opening idea (the g4 move suggested), not the Parham, which does not weaken the kingside, but turns white to Black as early as move two.
This is sad. Someone needs to just quit chess.
I'd rather be rated 600 and be able to learn then be 2400 and unable to learn anything.
Amen. IM Pfren has been incredibly patient by giving variations and for even simply commenting. Gavinator constantly laughed at IM's lines, by giving rotten refutations, but IM Pfren even gave more variations.
But that's not even the point. Gavinator doesn't respect an IM more than he respects a 1200.
Also, TonyH gave advice on deaf ears. This chess coach gave useful advice, but Gavinator and Whatupyodog didn't even reply. This is disgraceful.
Why the heck can't this die?
I think I had been playing chess for 10 years before I even met an IM and many years past that before one decided that I was worthy of their advice. Now we have this IM giving out this advice and 1400 players responding with " it amazes me to see more people downgrade someone who one they havent played ". If Kasparov came on here and told you the Parham was junk, would you believe him? What level of authority does it take?
This internet age has sure made people disrespectful of their betters.
Im at a GM level.
I'm a monkey's uncle.
Not tracking comments anymore.
Should i stay or should I go?
by Dischyzer a few minutes ago
Kasparov: Making mistakes in chess.
by Matthew721 2 minutes ago
Help - why is it happening ?
by paulgottlieb 3 minutes ago
5/22/2013 - Good Night to the Enemy
by pbazan 4 minutes ago
which is better, kings gambit or polish opening??
by Cloverstinnia 4 minutes ago
Choose: (1) ....0-0 or (2) ...Bxg2
by LongIslandMark 4 minutes ago
List of cheaters bug (or intentional by chess.com)?
by Almost_Master 4 minutes ago
Why do so few players play 30 min live chess?
by paulgottlieb 6 minutes ago
by a3vdv 8 minutes ago
iOS App Crashing
by Calamondin 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com