13047 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
nice try, i play , i'm no beginner move to drop the queen, try 1. e4 Nf6 2. e5 . this is matrix chess not give away chess
what's a matrix game?
Please refrain from feeding the troll.
the matrix game uses one pattern which all the pieces and pawns use to move , this such pattern is used to see patterns and indexing skill, and to stear away from traps and mates. This matrix game was taken internationality last month by Bernard Parham himself. At a Senior Open by FIDE, which Parham got permission to teach matrix chess internationality. Yes, it is possible to use matrix!!!
by the way parham finished 14th at that tournament
Nakamura has also tried Qh5 against the Sicilian, 1.e4 c5 2.Qh5. The move has also been tried against the French, 1.e4 e6 2.Qh5, and I mean by 2000+ players. Admittedly, though, only a few of the more daring, or crazy, ones...... As long as the square is there, people will put the queen on it!
OK, Naka has tried 2.Qh5 few times, but against Black's most proncipled reply (2...Nf6!) he has scored 0/3. OK, two of the games were blitz, and the opponents strong (Karjakin and Markus), but he also played it under regular time control against Volokitin!
I had the privilege of playing Mr. Parham twice in one weekend a number of years ago; the games are in the above post. He played 2.Qh5 against the Caro and I got a fine game, despite being out rated by 500 points or so. At the time I was a 1500 player, and am proud that despite losing both games, I made a good account of myself both times...up to a point ;) But I have to agree with the general consensus that white's 2nd move Qh5 gives a weaker player of the black pieces an easy game.
@SonofaBishop67: Interesting games against Parham. I had to keep reminding myself, especially in the first, that white won, as black seemed to have an advantage in the early stages. 2.Qh5 really looks suspicious against the Caro-Kann. However, I have seen 1.e4 c6 2.Qf3!? tried by some lunatics, including me. It's not as crazy as it looks at first glance, and actually, it can transpose into something called the Goldman Variation after after 2...d5 3.Nc3. For example, see Short Nigel D vs Zilber Israel .
Thanks for that interesting game, Melvin. Indeed, I feel I lost to the player and not the opening. I wont go so far as to call them unsound, just that I got an easy game; however I can not say how I would fare against 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 as I dont play black side of double king pawns; I might get crushed faster ;)
The Parham Attack is a horrible opening. Only noobs who wanna do the four move checkmate will play this.
Naka also made a comment on his Qh5 idea and he said it was an experiment. [I actually watched him play it on ICC at the time, he won because of skill not the opening] It isnt bad but also white ends up with zero advantage in the opening so it was time to be serious... (after he lost OTB with it) he climbed after he started to learn theory.
its also bad because you learn no pattern to build on after the tricks fail.
I am not sure what you saying Gavinator,.. the Whole idea of 1. e4 e5 2. Qh5 is flat out a beginner move. The whole idea is based on wishful thinking that your opponent will play poorly and suddenly you have a good attack.
1) stronger players wont play poorly
2) even if you win your building your pattern recognition on that do nothing for you later
3) there are better openings that give white better long term chances.
What I typically show kids is the following "refutation" yasser has a nice talk about how he started out with this idea early on
and gave it up after the following game...
that is very true, in fact the lines go much deeper that that, if you play black there are traps and tactics all the time
Yep, these lines are extremely deep. Be careful to avoid drowning in them!
OK so lets analyse Ne2
how and at what move, and remember be nice, just because someone diagrees and wants proof doesn't mean they are a dummy, btw you sound an awefull lot like the us government
Lol how? The Government is full of socialists... And for the game I'd probably get something like d3 going.
Not that I have a horse in this race, but you honestly don't see the parallels between what you call socialism, and recommending everyone cripple their chess progress by immersing themselves in mediocre, antipositional openings that will cause everyone to stagnate at the same level, and for the same reasons?
CONTEST: Caption this Image of Anand & Carlsen
by webmaster a few minutes ago
Based on what basis the tournament creator can removed a player
by pt22064 a few minutes ago
Scotch and Soda
by batgirl a few minutes ago
December 1, 2013. Mate in 7
by BigDoggProblem 2 minutes ago
by Sangwin 3 minutes ago
Carlsen is mediocre - my analyses
by badger_song 3 minutes ago
October 30, 2013. Mate in 3
by rachelb0987 12 minutes ago
December 5, 2013. Mate in 6
One More Win
by rachelb0987 13 minutes ago
Magnus vs Fritz 8.Who wins
by TBentley 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!