Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Parham Conspriacy Theory


  • 3 years ago · #221

    kco

    DrSpudnik wrote:

    Everything fails eventually...

    .... including the Parham.

  • 3 years ago · #222

    ilikeflags

    not bacon

  • 3 years ago · #223

    ilikeflags

    nor kirk

  • 3 years ago · #224

    ilikeflags

    nor the empire strikes back

  • 3 years ago · #225

    ilikeflags

    joyce never fails

  • 3 years ago · #226

    ilikeflags

    twain is a sure thing too

  • 3 years ago · #227

    ilikeflags

    the '50 ford shoebox never fails

  • 3 years ago · #228

    DrSpudnik

    How many cheeks does a person have to turn around here?

  • 3 years ago · #229

    zborg

    DrSpudnik wrote:

    How many cheeks does a person have to turn around here?

    4 cheeks per player.  5 million members.  Big Number to turn.

  • 3 years ago · #230

    kco

    Sungolian wrote:

    It is a conspiracy. Whatupyodog supposedly got banned for using an "f-bomb" right? Well I call BS on that. He got banned for liking the Parham. You know why? Look at what kco said here:

     

    Yup that's right, uncensored f-bomb right there. And he's not banned! I even reported him, and all they did was delete his post. Yup, I love how "fair" they are here with rule enforcement.

    Sungolier, that statment belong in the group, doesn't belong in the public forum, so you are asking for trouble here.

  • 3 years ago · #231

    kco

    the mod and straff have no control ( alittle) in the groups only the super adim of that group. you are asking for trouble for posting the f word in the public forum is where the mod and stafff does have control of.

  • 3 years ago · #232

    DrSpudnik

    zborg wrote:
    DrSpudnik wrote:

    How many cheeks does a person have to turn around here?

    4 cheeks per player.  5 million members.  Big Number to turn.

    If they all turned at once, would it affect the motion of the planet?

  • 3 years ago · #233

    netzach

    The statement is not directly-quoted (shaded-grey) so may be out of context to re-paste here Sungolian.

    Certainly a moderator will now have to delete/edit the comment which is kind of wasting their time ?

    Possible for you to avoid that & delete or edit the post yourself.

  • 3 years ago · #234

    netzach

    Sungolian wrote:
    netzach wrote:

    The statement is not directly-quoted (shaded-grey) so may be out of context to re-paste here Sungolian.

    Certainly a moderator will now have to delete/edit the comment which is kind of wasting their time ?

    Possible for you to avoid that & delete your post yourself.

    it's a screenshot of his entire post. so it's accurate. also the rules say no profanity. there isn't anything in the rules that says certain contexts make it allowable. i'm telling you, i know other members get banned for doing the exact same thing, but this guy is getting a free pass.

    Well okay is up to you. I have lost my temper once on here & swore but in my case the comment was deleted by a moderator with a langauge warning. Likely similar action will be taken with kco.


Back to Top
This forum topic has been locked.