11901 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
So I've been playing the Ruy Lopez as white in a run of recent games and have been running into trouble with this line which frequently occurs at my level of play.
I know 3 . . a6 4. Ba4 is the Morphy Defense. I also know, I think, that black usually doesn't follow with b5 (could be wrong). Unfortunately, at my level, they do and it's been causing me problems.
Any suggestions on how to either avoid this situation or to capitalize as white in some way that I just don't see.
Note: this is not a current position in any of my live games, but, rather, something I encountered 4 or so times in the last month.
There's nothing wrong with an immediate b5, and there's only one move for you to reply with. Where's the problem?
The only way to avoid it is to stop playing the Ruy Lopez, and you can't capitalise because it isn't weak.
Normally b5 isn't normally immediate simply because white isn't really threatening to win a pawn until he supports his own rook.
I know I only have one response. It was just one of those things were you don't see 4. . b5 in any of the intros. to the Ruy that you see at my level (Idiot's guide to openings, etc.) Thought there might be something I was missing that better players use in response to make that an unpopular line at higher levels.
Black very often plays b7-b5 in the ruy lopez, just not this early.
The reason is because black has no hurry in playing this move. White is not really threatening to play Bxc6 followed by Nxe5 until hes pawn on e4 is defended. So the general rule of thumb is to wait with b7-b5 until white defends hes e-pawn.It's better for black to be flexible as possible with this advance.
Some people also claim there is a more concrete problem to using this move-order if black tries to develop normally and transpose to standard lines. Unfortunately I don't know enough about this line to say for sure if it's good or not, but I'll give you the line which supposedly punishes black or using this move-order.
At your level, you could try meeting 4. ... b5 with:
6.Ng5 is simply a stupid move here- it doesn't work because the bishop is on b3, not c4: 6...d5 7.ed5 Nd4, and Black is already better. Actually this is a bad Fritz variation (with the bishop having retreated to b3 instead of f1) and also Black having an extra move (...a7-a6) for free.
In short, yes, it's recommendable to play like that if you want to lose. Ac trually this is the case ion your example in the end of the "blue" variation: white is rather lost after either 9...Qxc7, or 9...Qd5. After 8.d6? the move 8...Qxd6 is also very good for Black. Could you recommend something less crappy?
White should simply play 6.0-0, which will transpose to the (Neo)Arkhangelsk, since he has no better move to punish Black's move order (6.d4 Nxe4!)
It would be good if I could remember the source of where I learned about "the punishment". I do however have some vague memory of the ideas. I guess it's just not as good as this source made it out to be. I've also heared quite strong players saying this is a good line for white.
It might be instructive to post what I remember anyway.
6. d4 Nxe4 is met with 7. dxe5 which usually isn't a good idea in this kind of situation with the bishop still on a4 since when black plays Nc5 the bishop is forced to be exchanged for one of the knights.Whites idea now is to meet 7...Nc5 with 8. Bd5. Then put pressure with active development. Supposedly giving white a slight advantage.
If, as our IM comrade states, 6.Ng5 is a bad/"stupid" move, why would it be OK for someone of the OP's level to play it?
is this player better then Magnus
by varelse1 a few minutes ago
Resign repeated times
by Bur_Oak 6 minutes ago
QG - Tarrasch vs Albin Counter Gambit
by bresando 7 minutes ago
12/5/2013 - Too Many Attackers, Too Little Defenders
by TaiKwanCheck 7 minutes ago
Novag Citrine and Arena GUI
by NigelNice 10 minutes ago
Positional response to e4?
by Yaroslavl 27 minutes ago
what is this whole "carlsen plays like a computer" nonsense
by kco 29 minutes ago
Fun Chess Puzzles
by Beyond42 39 minutes ago
Autoplay the only SINGLE move option
by deepakbhide 40 minutes ago
12/2/2013 - Mate in 2
by Folguk 55 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!