10026 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is a facinating opening. Totally new and original. There are so many openings and defences with their special names and titles in the ancient books of "Shatrang-Nameh" (Chess Book in Pahlavi or middle Persian language). This book was later named "Shatranj-Nameh".
The openings and defences such as "Iranian Attack", "Cyrus Opening", "Parthian Defence" etc. are new ones yet to be explored.
I've said it five months ago and I'll say it again: it's NOT fascinating. There's nothing fascinating or interesting about it. By calling such an opening that, you're proving that you're just bluffing and don't really understand chess at all.
"totally new and original", "yet to be explored".... you could say that about 99% of the first six or eight half-moves of the game of chess.
I'm just tired of seeing every opening being called "fascinating", the "fascinating king's gambit" has merit. The "fascinating smith-morra" not so much. The "fascinating queen's gambit" - yes, but you'll only fully appreciate it if you're 2500+. The "fascinating london system"... yeah right. And this opening that just breaks all the rules of openings and handicaps both players without any play on either side is a joke and is NOT FASCINATING, it's ridiculous. I guess simple things are fascinating to simple minds.
Chess is infinite. If this is true then Chess could not be limited to mainstream openings and defences.
Yeah, but this opening can't actually be used.
This is also an opening:
So is this:
Those are lines that have been explored,so they are openings.
I've said it five months ago and I'll say it again: it's NOT fascinating. There's nothing fascinating or interesting about it.
Yes it is fascinating... to see some people are trollish enough to try, let alone defend, that kind of lines.
you know i once new a persian, you know he opened with showing me a book about iran and i was no thanks, but thanks for frightening me.
Isn't opening 1.e4 a sign of disrespect?
by SeanHarper15 a few minutes ago
What is the worst first move for White? The UNBIASED thread, all trolls welcome
by nyLsel a few minutes ago
How to simply stop all ads without paying!
by btickler a few minutes ago
How To Get More Women Into Chess
by Mersaphe 12 minutes ago
I Don't See the Point of the Touch-Move Rule
by MuhammadAreez10 13 minutes ago
7/28/2014 - Mate in 4
by NomadicKnight 17 minutes ago
isn't resignation a form of disrespect
by ScharDomain 21 minutes ago
andriod app update pushed out yesterday
by alien_roger 44 minutes ago
Help, I can't improve. Any tips?
by casper_van_eersel 53 minutes ago
If Fischer would played Karpov for the World Champion, who would win?
by najdorf96 83 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!