10843 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Opening are just the collected wisdom of those who have gone before and tried to find the best moves. If you know some opening theory, that's good, but you need to know WHY you are playing the moves.
If you know what you should be trying to do in the typical positions that arise from an opening then you should be able to find a good move if your opponent deviates from what the book says he should do.
In general, it's best to stick with general principles, unless you are absolutely sure that the specific position you are in justifies breaking them.
you can try wikipedia. they have pretty good resources on French Defence & Sicillian Defence.
Why were you attacking a pawn with a knight anyway? Pawns can easily be sacrificed, you're knight was going to do no harm by itself up there! Thats what created the fork, I know sometimes attack is the best form of defense but sometimes its wise to retreat.
[I] have come across very unusual or dare i say seemingly innacurate lines, which have completely thrown me from the start.
You're learning one reason why it's not so productive to study opening variations until your rating's quite a bit higher. Studying opening principles makes more sense.
Do I continue with opening principles, i.e development of minor pieces, not moving a developed piece twice etc, when i come across these, or should i try to take advantage of what i think is a bad move.
Glenn Wilson is a very strong chess player and I like the way he describes how to play the opening, which you can find here. Taking advantage of the bad move would be following his opening principles in many cases. :)
anyone know any good books/resources looking at the theory behind openings such as sicillian and french defence?
I know of a great online lesson that explains the ideas behind the French and Sicilian defenses and you can find it here. You might also try playing through a few master vs master or master vs amateur games in your opening.
SonofPearl, couldn't have said it better myself.
Are you really Bobby Fischer???
The best concept against strange lines for me has been first as myself what does this move actualy try to do? i dont panic! i just try to find the reason if i cant really find one that seems practical to me then i just continue along the same basic principles if u try to play like them and deviate to much u will put yourself in more trouble then u want because u r now in unformilar land pls excuse my terrible spelling ok but u get the idea thats what normaly works for me . u dont need huge depth to play openings when your learning only when u become really good at general principles and understand the nature of the openings in general and in the particular opening and thats about 1800+ i believe. A nice book on that i personaly liked was winning chess openings by:- yasser seirawan . the moves dont go deaper then about 6 moves and he shows u the general idea behind the moves very well . Well thats just one book of course. so hope this helped alittle mate. Keep thinking like your doing and asking these questions i can see u could be a very good chess player one day.....
Reuben Fine's "Ideas Behind the Chess Openings."
by mkelowna a few minutes ago
by leiph18 7 minutes ago
How do you play against people who refuse to castle
by varelse1 12 minutes ago
by Jitesh 18 minutes ago
Annand shows who's the boss.
by onthehouse 19 minutes ago
Group Notes Access
by kzhang2012 20 minutes ago
by aks1210 26 minutes ago
Are 1.d4? or 1.c4? questionable
by Fromper 27 minutes ago
1/31/2015 - Ryklis-Ivasyuk, USSR 1982
by JOVINDSOUZA 28 minutes ago
Just when you thought you've Won...
by CTB755 29 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!