Bg5 is not the best move, but at class level the subtleties of the nimzo arn't that important.
Just remember to protect your bishop pair and try to open up the position. "Where I wen't wrong" implies you think an innaccurate opening move is the cause of your loss. Bg5 was only a mistake if you didn't have any reason in your mind for playing it. Did you follow through with some sort of plan? What happened to that plan? Why did it or did it not work?
The easiest to learn and perhaps most principled line against the nimzo is 4. Qc2. Black doesn't get to double your pawns but white is behind in development. Follow up with 5. a3 to force the exchange then be careful not to exchange a bishop without getting some other advantage for it.
well i lost because i blundered badly... i just wanted to know if bg5 is considered bad or not.. and why.... yes of course q2.. but i think its more fun to let him ruin the pawn chain... i might be wrong but i think white is better after all... i mean you can still win with a ruined pawn chain... well the idea behind bg5 is so that i can play e3 without the bishop locked down and take away blacks best kingside defender.. or if he moves the bishop back to e7 to dislocate his bishop. ok thx anyway...
well actually i now where i think about yes i think i even lost because of bg5, bg5 hands over to black the entire game.. cant believe people with white could even win
Well i played a game recently which i lost, now i wanted to look the moves up, where i went wrong. the moves were 1.d4 e6 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Bg5 c5
the opening explorer says that more games were won with black in that line, so did i already mess up with white?? was bg5 a mistake??