19116 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Can you please help me in some variations for how to play queens gambit declined as black? i want to know how to reply for queens gambit as black?
You can start here:
Not a complete repertoire for Black against 1.d4 d5 2.c4, nor it is always factual or up-to-date, but still a good start.
Yes, that's very reasonable material to start off with. In the 7Rc1 I think there is a strange looking suggestion of responding with Nc6. It would be nice to know what IM pfren thinks of the quality of this?, or anyone else who has tried it out.
I am not convinced about the value of 9...Nc6.
After the most natural reply 10.Bd3 Black has many problems in a given game (Flear- Chaplin) around move 15.
The usual ways with ...Nxc3 and then going either for e5, or c5 are more reliable.
Thank you so much!.. its helping me to study a lot about it :)IM Prefen? can you help me more if you dont mind? If yes i will ask my questions!
Thanks for reply too IM prefen.
You might also study the games of top players who have played the Black side - Anand, Topalov, Kramnik have all played a number of QGD games. Playing over them gives you a sense not only of the opening moves, but also of the middlegame plans and even the typical endgames which may arise. It is a better guide than just memorizing opening variations which end with "a slight plus for White" or "the position is equal" and no clue what to do from there.
Kasparov's books on matches with Karpov, or "Test of time" are hard to beat for quality analysis of complete games with Queen's Gambit declined. Most of the games are based around Tartakower rather than Lasker. Starting off, wouldn't matter too much switching between two, and learning principals. The more recent "Kasparov on modern chess" series has nice chessbase versions can flick through too.
The Tartakower is more ambitious, and more difficult to play for both sides: needs good evaluations of unbalanced positions with isolated pawn and hanging pawns. "Test of Time" is reference work in such positions- you will learn by it much more than any opening book.
Chess is very hard because it`s stupid, here is my proof!
by Mortal_Kombat_Chess a few minutes ago
Who will Win FIDE Women´s Grand Prix? 3-15 October 2015
by P_or 2 minutes ago
Why did my opponent castle?
by aggressivesociopath 5 minutes ago
My excursion into Russian/Soviet Chess Sets
by rcmacmillan 5 minutes ago
The Hnerf Attack
by abrahampenrose 8 minutes ago
queen vs knight endgame
by PeskyGnat 9 minutes ago
Chess Bazaar's New Soviet Set--A Pictorial Review
by rcmacmillan 9 minutes ago
My first game on chess.com
by TrevM 12 minutes ago
Is the USCF primarily for Children ?
by Thomas9400 16 minutes ago
10/9/2015 - In From Behind
by SilverCrown 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!