Retí Opening: Nimzo-Larsen Attack

Jump to forum:
 
2nd June 2009, 03:56pm
#1
by gxtmf1
Mundelein United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1300

In his book Mikhail Botvinnik's 100 Selected Games, the Soviet World Champion annotates a particular variation as follows: 1. Nf3 d5 2. b3 c5 3. Bb2?!

Do you think this is an inaccuracy/ error? And what are your thoughts regarding 3. ..f6 ?

2nd June 2009, 11:35pm
#2
by Estragon
United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 202

Well, I don't think White's play offers any serious chance of opening advantage.  Its value is as a surprise weapon to be sprung occasionally on the unsuspecting (probably most useful against diehard Slav or King's Indian players), not so much against one of the top two players in the world at the time.

Is 3 Bb2 a dubious move?  I don't see how; White is clearly going to put the Bishop there anyway and has no way to prevent ...f6 (even if it was desirable to do so).  And what precisely would be the better move to suggest?  e3?  c4?  Ba3?  Sorry, I don't see it.

...f6 is playable, but no gamebreaker.  It is typical of the challenging attitude a player might have against a much weaker opponent.  Personally, I would much prefer simple development with ...Nf6, or even ...Nc6 instead of the riskier ...f6.

2nd June 2009, 11:53pm
#3
by gxtmf1
Mundelein United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1300

I see 3. d4 as being acceptable. 

3rd June 2009, 12:35am
#4
by Estragon
United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 202

Sure, it's playable, too, is it any stronger than 3 Bb2 is?  Nothing Black can do will prevent White from playing 4 d4 if it's a good move then.

In the actual game, Lisitin played an early Bf1-b5 and then, unprovoked and unthreatened, retreated Bb5-e2, losing a tempo for nothing and putting the Bishop on a less effective square.  From that point on, Black was clearly better - but it had nothing to do with 3 Bb2.

3rd June 2009, 01:02am
#5
by linksspringer
Scotland, UK Netherlands
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 6468

According to opening theory, 3.Bb2 is inaccurate as Black can now shut down the long diagonal with 3...f6. Because of this, 3.e3 is to be preferred, rendering 3...f6 less effective after 4.d4! (from Jacobs and Tait, Nimzo-Larsen attack).

4th June 2009, 03:27pm
#6
by gxtmf1
Mundelein United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1300

Thanks Linkspringer!

3rd July 2009, 02:57am
#7
by BillyIdle
Humboldt Park, Chicago United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 4481

Linkspringer,

You have the Nimzo-Larsen book, but I did not know you played this opening.

I often play the Sokolsky or Polish Opening with White.  Basically playing 1.b4 and 2.Bb2  The move f6 is much more common against the Sokolsky and the only difference is where White has placed the b pawn.

So, I would have to say that f6 is not an error or a weak move.  I once owned Botvinnik's 100 Selected Games, but don't remember this game at all. 

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.