13610 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
man i lost so often as white in such games, i must be expert on queen d4 and queen g5 moves
White has no advantage here, so its safe to assume that 5.Nxe5 is nothing special.
5.0-0 is the right move, when Black is alive, but not well.
I would also like to stress that whoever believes that the Exchange variation is "harmless" is simply uneducated. Black has just two ways to proven equality (4...dc6 5.0-0 Bg4 6.h3 h5 and 4...dc6 5.0-0 Qf6) but neither of them is clear of pits.
Recently Caruana fell into deep trouble against Najditch at the Grenke super-tournament employing the "solid" 5...Qf6 variation, which he handled rather poorly. Actually he won the game, but his position was certainly not enviable.
abiogenisis, you apparently have misunderstood. If 4. Bxc6 bxc6, 5. Nxe5, then what is Black's response?Your answer, ...Qd4, seems to assume that Black's fouth move was the traditional dxc6. My question was addressed to the question posed by the OP, namely, what is wrong with 4 ...bxc6? My suggestion is that one thing wrong with it is that Black cannot play Qd4 after 5. Nxe5.How does Black fare in that line after 5. Nxe5?
Yeah I did, someone already mentioned that.
Maybe I was misunderstood- I don't think the exchange is "harmless" it's just that black's position is more to my taste.
Tim Taylor was advocating 4...bc6 in his Spanish repertoire book (on the modern Steinitz). I wasn't convinced at all, but then I wasn't convinced by any Taylor book...
The more I read this book the more I realize how much of it contains just plain wrong information. I need to go back to Amazon and update my review -- he will not be pleased.
In his KID book, he says 99.999% lines are winning for White in the FPA.
I thought Qd6 was a move.
(after dxc6 0-0)
5...Qd6 6.Na3 is somewhat clumsy to meet- at least in practice Black isn't scoring well.
5...f6 is also OK, but not terribly ambitious- Black declares he is satisfied with a draw, and willing to suffer (very mildly) to achieve it.
Magnus Carlsen: 2900
by Rosheen-Dove a few minutes ago
Amusing Cheating Accusation
by XDave121X 2 minutes ago
Can intelligent person suck at chess, forever?
by adweithisdeadly 4 minutes ago
9/5/2015 - Ragozin - Bronstein, USSR Championship 1945, Modif
by Nanacc 11 minutes ago
*NEW* Report Spam here!
by ChessPatzer987 13 minutes ago
Quite a sort loser
by Rosheen-Dove 14 minutes ago
Predictions for the 2015 Chess World Cup
by Synaphai 18 minutes ago
The Perfect Game...?
by Lady-Knight 25 minutes ago
Another Chess Poem!
by Lady-Knight 46 minutes ago
Intentionally Aborted or Disconnected
by Slobbe 59 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!