16155 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I have noticed some games in the closed variations of Ruy Lopez where white plays a4. It seems to be quite a common theme in many lines. I have seen it in the Archangel and the chigorin amongst others. Clearly it has some immediate tactical threats in that it threatens to win a pawn, but GM's don't make moves like this just to threaten an easily defended pawn (black just has to defend his a8 rook). There must be more sound positional reasons behind it, but I don't really see it. It just looks ugly and weakening to me.
Here is an example in case you are wondering what I'm talking about.
Does anyone really play 9 a4 against you? It's a rare move in practice - White more often tries 9 h3 to avoid the pin, 9 d4 disdaining the pin, or 9 d3 heading for less critical variations.
a4 is a useful move for White in many lines, but not this soon - except in the case of 7...0-0 8 a4 where it is designed to avoid the Marshall Gambit.
Ahhh you misunderstand, I am trying to learn to play the opening as white. So I have studied a bunch of games and over and over again I see this move a4 at some point, often quite early in the opening and I am left wondering why it was played. I wondered if it was some common positional theme rather than a tactical ploy that is going over my head.
a4 is a standard way of avoiding the Marshall Gambit: a wise choice, since I don't know how to ride out the storm in that variation.
If played at the right time, a4 can destabilize Black's position, just when he thinks the game is quieting down. Timed wrong, it just opens a file for Black to contend for and lets Black off the hook from the traditional King-side attack.
Timing is everything. In the diagram above, it does look poorly timed.
Yes I understand I think. You are right, when I saw the a4 early it was not in this position and on checking you are right it is the anti marshall thing. In the Archangel their is an early a4 with some crazy tactics associated with it. And later, yes I see. The threat of opening up lines on the q side ties down blacks pieces so even though white mostly never utilises that threat (which is why I could never see any concrete reason for doing it) it still has an effect and in a way aids whites kingside attack! Is that right?
The Ruy Lopez is a lot like the cold war! It is more a case of threats and manouvers rather than outright battles and skirmishes.
Im starting to think that if you want to improve your chess game you should study every aspect of the Ruy Lopez and by the time you understand every subtlety in it you will be very very good indeed!
If you did learn that, you'd be one tough hombre.
Well, the Ruy Lopez is one of the most logical openings in chess. Strategy and tactics work together in so many different lines, it is certainly a worthy object of study from both sides.
Yes, it's the logic of the Lopez that impresses me with it. You are just about impelled forward to positions that, while cluttered looking, make perfect sense. To avoid this march of fate, some try to jiggle some initiative out of it by destabilizing the game early on with things like 3...Nd4 (Bird Var) or the Archangel or Schlieman.
I like the ruy lopez
Generally White plays a4 in the Ruy Lopez to throw a monkey wrench into Black's thematic queenside counter-play.
This allows White to continue with his slow but sure buildup on the kingside with moves like Nb1-d2-f1-g3(or e3). If White doesn't play a4 Black's pieces and pawns swarm all over the queenside and White's a1-rook suffocates.
Consider that sometimes it's possible to play Ra3 and then move the rook on kingside
I lasted 30 Moves against an NM!
by rooperi a few minutes ago
White sacs a knight on move 3 and wins a player with a rating of 3141 part 3
by mittensthebunny a few minutes ago
1 month trial membership
by Anubhav_2000 4 minutes ago
If you don't rematch after winning as white...
by -waller- 4 minutes ago
White sacs a knight on move 3 and wins against a player with a rating of 3141
by The_Ghostess_Lola 4 minutes ago
Awesome Mates: The Perfect Overthrow!!!!!!!!!
by salatoy 5 minutes ago
What do you feel about players that do perpetual checks when they are losing?
by BishopTARDIS 5 minutes ago
1000 ELO in Bullet, 1100 in Blitz, 2000 in Long games???
by johnyoudell 6 minutes ago
White sacs a knight on move 3 and wins a player with a rating of 3141 part 2
by mittensthebunny 9 minutes ago
4/18/2014 - Steinikov - Jaskoy, USSR 1988
by vijay_sena_reddy 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!