15384 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Scholar's is not an "opening" or a "technique" or a "strategy". It's a trap. There are many good players who use traps - but never traps that make their position worse. If you happen to threaten mate in one while improving your position, by all means. But to seek it out, despite what it does to your position, in the hope that your opponent won't see it?
If you want to keep setting up one-move-mate-threats, taking pleasure in wins over the sloppy, the new and the bad - have fun. But don't pat yourself on the back thinking you're a good player because of it.
well you just lose a bit of time with the queen so you give up white's opening advantage. But you don't mess up your position or anything. It's not like playing 1.g4 :P
There is a trap in the King's Gambit that works like magic in Lightning 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5. If fxe4 Qh4+ is devastating.
I think that scholar's mate is for people trying toscrew others out of a decent game. When I play Sicilian, I see this too often:
Those are my first two moves but I do not follow with the queen. I just like to get my bishop outside the pawn chain. I never even made the connection.
This is how it works out to:
When I was rated under 1200 in Blitz Games here at chess.com, I've used that trap very often, it worked I would say in 25% of the games. Now I'm rated 1400+/- and it's almost impossible to succeed with that trap.
According to your profile, Perfect_Idiot, it's no wonder that it works good. But when you improve your play and face stronger opponents, you shouldn't use it anymore. ;)
its not even a trap a trap needs bait in the scholars its more of "i hope he doesn't see that i am blatentley attacking his weak pawn with two pieces and my "subtle" threats"
People play scholars against me in almost 50% of games which is probably why my rating hasn't increased much. Its not a case of "falling" for the trap sometimes theres nothing you can do if you spot the threat too late.
There is a famous book named move first think later.
Famous for having just come out a few months ago
It's a fun trick/trap for the uninitiated. Failure however, can leave you slightly worse off.
that is madeup of illegal moves. its all rubbish
i suck soooooo bad
by FireAndLightz a few minutes ago
Does anyone want to be a Great Chess Player?
by megadroid a few minutes ago
Puzzles with no kings?
by megadroid 3 minutes ago
Most accurate game I had in a while.
by PilateBlue 4 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by Rambo2004 7 minutes ago
by FireAndLightz 10 minutes ago
1/30/2015 - White Draws
by CHESSGRIMM 11 minutes ago
Do Americans tend to flame more on live chess
by kaynight 11 minutes ago
team posting in vote chess
by kleelof 15 minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by MSC157 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!