16439 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Scholar's is not an "opening" or a "technique" or a "strategy". It's a trap. There are many good players who use traps - but never traps that make their position worse. If you happen to threaten mate in one while improving your position, by all means. But to seek it out, despite what it does to your position, in the hope that your opponent won't see it?
If you want to keep setting up one-move-mate-threats, taking pleasure in wins over the sloppy, the new and the bad - have fun. But don't pat yourself on the back thinking you're a good player because of it.
well you just lose a bit of time with the queen so you give up white's opening advantage. But you don't mess up your position or anything. It's not like playing 1.g4 :P
There is a trap in the King's Gambit that works like magic in Lightning 1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5. If fxe4 Qh4+ is devastating.
I think that scholar's mate is for people trying toscrew others out of a decent game. When I play Sicilian, I see this too often:
Those are my first two moves but I do not follow with the queen. I just like to get my bishop outside the pawn chain. I never even made the connection.
This is how it works out to:
When I was rated under 1200 in Blitz Games here at chess.com, I've used that trap very often, it worked I would say in 25% of the games. Now I'm rated 1400+/- and it's almost impossible to succeed with that trap.
According to your profile, Perfect_Idiot, it's no wonder that it works good. But when you improve your play and face stronger opponents, you shouldn't use it anymore. ;)
its not even a trap a trap needs bait in the scholars its more of "i hope he doesn't see that i am blatentley attacking his weak pawn with two pieces and my "subtle" threats"
People play scholars against me in almost 50% of games which is probably why my rating hasn't increased much. Its not a case of "falling" for the trap sometimes theres nothing you can do if you spot the threat too late.
There is a famous book named move first think later.
Famous for having just come out a few months ago
It's a fun trick/trap for the uninitiated. Failure however, can leave you slightly worse off.
that is madeup of illegal moves. its all rubbish
10/1/2014 - Mate in 3 Again
by jakeryan150482 a few minutes ago
who is better and why
by chessterd5 a few minutes ago
When it is appropriate to learn the Nimzo-Indian?
by Fixing_A_Hole 3 minutes ago
Why I am not improving?
by camberfoil 4 minutes ago
The greatest player that "might" have lived.
by K_Brown 4 minutes ago
Converting Chess.com to USCF
How to Become a GM: By Zod
by camberfoil 6 minutes ago
Kasparov on Stupidity
by lebid 6 minutes ago
Anglo-Dutch: 4...c6 dark square attack
by dodgernation 7 minutes ago
Who's your fav in the Top Ten?
by josiah777 8 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!