15572 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The Rubinstein variation of the symmetric English should be a good choice if you want a aggressive game. Unfortunately, white is not forced to enter this system.
i play 1.nf6 its very flexible and can transpose easily for example take this game i had recently
I predict much chess progress for you when you realize the bishop pair has nothing to do with "emotional attachment"
thats all i have to do?
as in Fant-Carlsen 2002
Carlsen was eleven years old, if that means anything to you.
Anyway, the ...b6 systems against the English are perfectly good, as long as you master the "Art of doing nothing" (this is the way Sergei Shipov describes the Hedgehog in his excellent book). But you DO have to start with 1...c5 or 1...Nf6, and be aware of the numerous transpositions that exist.
True, but 11 year old carlsen was between FM and iM strength, stronger than everyone commenting on this threa, with the exception maybe of you.If its good enough for an FM/IM i dont see why they think its not good enough for them.
By far simplest is c4 e5 I think. I don't like the Bb4 lines as much if white plays Nd5, and what is the point? You can avoid this by playing Bc5 to begin with. This is all perfectly healthy development, but it doesn't mean the game is easy.
The other way out is playing ''your own defense'' like the KID or the Slav block. It isn't your problem white won't play d4. There are some differences but they can be handled.
I think the c4-c5 lines that may lead to Hedgehog type structures are very difficult. They can certainly be played, but you should have some idea of positional play.
The KID against the English is a royal pain in the butt (for Black) if white opts for the Botvinnik setup. Black has absolutely no attack, and quite a few complex positional problems to solve.
1...e5 is fine, where I always opted for the ...Bb4 systems, which are just fine: very solid, and also offering winning chances to Black.
The KID against the English is a royal pain in the butt (for Black) if white opts for the Botvinnik setup. Black has absoluteloy no attack, and quite a few complex positional problems to solve.
you are the master but wouldnt the kid not turn into the normal botvinnik set up in the english opening, or is the botvinnik set up bad for black in general?
I know the Botwinnik as an interesting option, I don't know it to that extent. Luckily, after 1.c4 e5 there is no problem. The only ''trick'' is 1.Nf3 Nf6 and then 2.c4! I think incorporating e5 is awkward now, for example 2...d6 3.d4 is a real KID. In case you don't want to play that it is annoying.
On the upside, 1.Nf3 ruins your chances to play a real Botwinnik with Ne2.
However, it seems a player needs something in his reportoire other than 1.c4 e5. It's probably no issue for black players who play d4-d5 openings often. (1.Nf3 d5 2.d4) It's not so nice if you're tricked into a Queen's gambit while you don't know much about it.
@FearItself: the 1...b6 move order annoyed me for a long time. Anyway, I have the three volume series on the English opening (Grandmaster Repetoire Volumes 3,4,and 5) and it has served me very well. It has analysis all the way up to move 15 on some lines, and move 43 on other lines. It is very well-written and is written for a grandmaster--it could last you a lifetime. Easily. I hightly recommend the book.
Anyway, the book provided some interesting insights on 1...b6. It recommends 2.e4!! This transposes into the Botvinnik System, except a prefferable version, because the bishop is on b7, and the e4 pawn blocks it in. I've never lost a game with this setup.
To all interested, I made a reverse sicilian themed tournament (1. c4 e5). Seems like this would appeal to a lot of English players. Note: >1700 player rating range. http://www.chess.com/tournament/reverse-sicilian
"Reykjavik Open, Round 8 | Commentary by FM Ingvar Johannesson & Fiona Steil-Antoni"
why do we always ask, "who is the best?"
by bobbyDK a few minutes ago
Rate the username above
by zapped a few minutes ago
3/10/2014 - A Quick End
by surfzombie99 3 minutes ago
King and pawn vs king and pawn on same file
by Am_I_Not_Merciful 5 minutes ago
The candidates tournament is here!
by ozzie_c_cobblepot 7 minutes ago
How to throw away the game in 2 easy steps!
by harryz 12 minutes ago
What is the most complicated game ever?
by PAMetalBoss 12 minutes ago
1000 reasons why we can't beat Magnus Carlsen in chess.
by harryz 14 minutes ago
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by Cmagnus31 14 minutes ago
Was this exchange sacrifice sound?
by varelse1 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!