14896 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
So for now you have your own "Immortal game" :) congratulations.
My Immortal is this:
Very nice Queen Sac. senor
Thanks for posting the game WELL-DONE !!
Thanks, your was nice too.
I used idea of Richard Réti, born in my town 120 years ago.
Réti vs Tartakower (1910), aka "The Sucker Punch".
those are easy mates
Both games are awesome!
Hi832, please, share some of your amazing checkmates that noone will understand with us noobs. Or even better, let me have a game with you, where you can pull off some awesome tricks.
A Noble challenge but you are one of those 1800's types so Hi832 becomes Bye832 ! After you stomp this guy post it in the forums. lol
I have seen all the checkmates here (or very similar).Power of Chess has a lot of members, but Indian Maraders are the best on Chess.com vote Chess. They are good. 1210 really is not much of a rating. Not a complete amature though.
7 move checkmate + Queen Sacrifice
im not much lower than you
I wrote it 18, EIGHTEEN, months ago. That's year and a half. Meanwhile my son learned to walk, speak, recognize numbers. I finished university and found a job.
It looks like you have improved and waited for such a long time just to respond to my comment. My comment was relevant, again, EIGHTEEN MONTHS ago. Still I think those mates were nice and interesting. I am not saying the most difficult moves to find or the strongest attacks of all time, but your comment at the time was just random.
go ahead, understand why my opponent resigned
want proof? have it:
I think I understand - either after 12..Nxd5 13.Bxd5 Rc8 14.Rc1 d6 15.Rxc6 Qb4+ 16.Qxb4 Bxb4+ 17.Ke2 Kd7 he didn't want to defend the position with a doubled pawn down plus the bishop pair, or he didn't see the best defense.
Or I don't see the best defense..
I just wanted to say that it is clear that you improved a lot and now my comment looks rude. On the other hand I still think your comments #8 and #10 ("that is because you are low rated", which you deleted) was rude at the time.
Could somebody enlighten me on my mistakes here.
by brandnewgambit a few minutes ago
by Tartarus_BW 2 minutes ago
Chess Troll for the Year!
by Phantom_of_the_Opera 4 minutes ago
I am quitting chess.
by Mr_Tarkanian 6 minutes ago
12/9/2013 - Mate in 3
by duck11 7 minutes ago
Stockfish Notation question
by rooperi 8 minutes ago
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by aronchuck 9 minutes ago
What to play against the King's Indian Defense?
by JohnStormcrow 9 minutes ago
d4 d5 f4
by TitanCG 11 minutes ago
Komodo 6 Released But? The A.R.B Chess System Still Crushes!! it! :)
by TheARBChessSystem 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!