12133 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is only really to be played against a higher rated opponent who wants the win against you or if you are happy with a draw because your opponent can draw immidiately with Ke8 after Be6+. If black doesn't want the draw then the queen sacrifice gives white 2 pieces and a bind for compensation. Black's exposed king also helps white get a lot of active piece play.
Interesting. Perhaps Black is a tad better after 5...e6 6.Nc3 a6 7.a4 Nc6 8.Ngxe4 Nd5!?.
2...e6 was originally thought to be best, but now Tal's 2...d5! is the main move.
Funnily enough, Chess.com's David Pruess has some experience here:
8...Kc7 9.Bxg4 Qe8 is regarded as close to a refutation. The position is quite murky, though.
I like it a lot ... maybe i give it a try!?
In "When Two Pieces Beat a Queen" at ChessCafe, IM Tim Harding presents a tour de force treatment of the Bryntse Gambit (1.e4 c5 2.f4 d5 3.Nf3!? dxe4 4.Ng5), focusing on the Queen-sac line made famous by Dana Mackenzie.
When was 2....e6 considered strongest? The only time I ever faced 2.f4 I played 2....Nc6, which was thought best so far as I knew, according to theory at the time of that game (1978), and looked logical to me.
If I am correct when I say that Tal's adoption of 2...d5 made it popular, then your comment makes sense, becuase he didn't play this until 1979:
1.e4 c5 2.f4 d5
This move appeared in chessboards for the first time in Bernhard Horwitz 1-0 Henry Bird, London 1851.
Named Tal Gambit, after often played by Latvian grandmaster Mikhail Tal.
Bent Larsen 1/2-1/2 Mikhail Tal, Amsterdam Interzonal 1964
William Hartston 1/2-1/2 Mikhail Tal, Tallinin 1979
It is one of the recommended counters to the direct Grand Prix Attack.
If white accepts the gambit with 3.exd5, black's response is 3...Nf6, threatening the d5 pawn and gaining time in development.
If white chooses to decline the gambit, it is usually done by 3.e5. While white has a large space advantage now, it is still considered to be a favorable position for black. The response 3...e6 resembles and can transpose into a line of the French Defense which is favorable for black.
Although Tal's game played in 1964 did not have the Tal Gambit in its purest form.
Finally I managed to get the Bryntse Gambit on the chessboard!
Here is my game, enjoy!
Up to the next game.
"Q & A with Coach Dan Heisman"
Philidor Defense: Is it worth playing as Black?
by achja a few minutes ago
Nimzowitsch's Defense answer to d4 d5 Nc3
by bongcloudftw a few minutes ago
As a lower rated player . .
by MCBeaker a few minutes ago
Show every opening you know that starts with C4
by stas56 4 minutes ago
Is this a real chess opening?
by Lustchess 4 minutes ago
[HURT HEAL] OPENINGS
by onbliss 5 minutes ago
Post your game for expert analysis
by Seymour_Stein 5 minutes ago
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by batgirl 6 minutes ago
1,000 signs you play chess too much.
by zereh 7 minutes ago
Wives of Chess Players
by please_let_me_win 9 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!