The Halloween Gambit

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next » | Last Post
3rd August 2009, 11:35am
#41
by Skwerly
Yucaipa, CA United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 566

I used to have my engine play this a lot against Net users - it was a real hoot!  The bot never lost with it, but it came close a few times.  It is definitely a sharp opening that will put some flare in the game hehe.

 

:)

11th October 2009, 01:43pm
#42
by THCCKINGJON
In a Van, down by the river United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1262
einstein2191 wrote:

Croat_1993, you would be surprised at how many are beaten with this opening. One of its main perks is surprising the enemy, and "a player suprised is half beaten".


very true my friend  !!

23rd October 2009, 07:10pm
#43
by einstein2191
Bay Area, California United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 534

If anyone has a game where they have played this opening and had an interesting game, doesn't matter if you lost won or tied, feel free to post it here so everyone can take a look and discuss!Cool

-einstein2191

23rd October 2009, 07:24pm
#44
by chirp55
Kendall Park United States
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 141

This oppening is very different from what i'm used to. The next time the four knights comes up in one of my blitz games, i'll use this. But this won't be very useful in slow games cause the opponent will probably be able to calculate all the variations(im talking G/90 and above, anything less and the opponent will probably get into time trouble).

23rd October 2009, 08:13pm
#45
by einstein2191
Bay Area, California United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 534
chirp55 wrote:

This oppening is very different from what i'm used to. The next time the four knights comes up in one of my blitz games, i'll use this. But this won't be very useful in slow games cause the opponent will probably be able to calculate all the variations(im talking G/90 and above, anything less and the opponent will probably get into time trouble).


Though it is true that giving the opponent more time to think about the moves will give him/her a less chance of making a mistake, part of defeating this gambit is knowing enough opening theory to counteract it. Defending against this gambit requires an un-logical way of thinking for part of it and no matter how much time is spent on a move, if you don't know what you're doing it won't matter.

23rd October 2009, 08:29pm
#46
by General-Lee
Elizabethtown United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 265

Hahahahahahahaha! I'm playing in a currently won position against the "Halloween Gambit". See board for the rest of my commentary:

24th October 2009, 10:52pm
#47
by einstein2191
Bay Area, California United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 534
General-Lee wrote:

Hahahahahahahaha! I'm playing in a currently won position against the "Halloween Gambit". See board for the rest of my commentary:

 


Very nice defense, white should have put more pressure on you. For instance, rather than play Bd3 attaking your knight, he should have played Bc4 to attack the king-side pawn. This pawn can be attacked again by Qf3 which leads to a more aggressive game. Whites biggest mistake, letting you re-develop your pieces and giving you opportunities to stabalize your position.

25th October 2009, 08:52am
#48
by genius1995
Singapore Singapore
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 7

tip for black if u think you are playing against someone experienced in this opening, do not take the peice. however if you feel confident just do it. it can result in a good game. 

25th October 2009, 06:42pm
#49
by redsoxfan33
United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 909

can the halloween gambit follow 1. e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bb5

25th October 2009, 06:42pm
#50
by redsoxfan33
United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 909

Can the halloween gambit follow 1. e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bb5 a6?

25th October 2009, 07:16pm
#51
by RosarioVampire
Singapore
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 260

No.

6th November 2009, 07:54pm
#52
by jordanszetho
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 121

Thanks for this opening. I'll try it on other people.n =)

8th December 2009, 12:45am
#53
by jordanszetho
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 121

Nice opening going to try it on my dad! =)

8th December 2009, 01:14am
#54
by amitprabhale
Mumbai India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 293

In the first game what if black plays Qxb2 instead of a6..... plzzz explain.

8th December 2009, 01:28am
#55
by RosarioVampire
Singapore
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 260

In the first game, if black plays 10...Qxb2, then 11.Bd4 Qb4+ 12.c3 Qa5 13.f5 a6 14.Nc7.

8th December 2009, 01:55am
#56
by amitprabhale
Mumbai India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 293
RosarioVampire wrote:

In the first game, if black plays 10...Qxb2, then 11.Bd4 Qb4+ 12.c3 Qa5 13.f5 a6 14.Nc7.


Y wud black play a6 after f5 if Ne5 is possible???

8th December 2009, 02:39am
#57
by RosarioVampire
Singapore
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 260

Ne5 Bxe5.

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.