15303 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
If you play the KID, try not to trade pieces in the opening, try to keep it as complicated as you can for the enemy.
The position makes my point, you have a backward point, bad development, and it looks bad for black.
if you choose to try to play the f5 stuff every game, it will lead to disaster. It's not playable against everything.
Yes, i am quickly discovering that.
the f5 pawn push really only works well if white chooses to play with a closed pawn center (pawns on c4, d5, e4), I do not fancy black's chances of going f5 if white delays d5 for a while.
Maybe looking at Kasparov's games with the King's Indian can illuminate some ideas for you:
Yeah kasparov's games are amazing to look at, if you never learn theory, his games will teach what the heck you are suppose to do against the KID.
Try playing the Budapest. The natural, smooth road to chess regularity!
At the moment, there is a article about the KID featured on chess.com's homepage: here
actually, its a book review, but you could look into it if you are interested.
Here is a particularly constipated one that ended in a blunder:
And yet the position doesn't seem highly aggressive, and its hardly tactical.
I am simply disputing that the KID is some kind of aggressive opening, I'm really not sure that it is... (again, the bad bishops, the closed position, etc...)
Wouldn't something like the Sicilian be considered more aggressive?
What is more aggressive, the KID or the Sicilian Dragon?
Seems a fair question.
Drink some prune juice, then quit the KIngs Indian.
Are you deciding between the two? That can't be done. They each respond to different white first moves. In other words, the Sicilian is in response to 1 e4 and the KID is in response to 1 d4.
If you want something universal (can be used against queen pawn and king pawn) then perhaps the Modern defense, or perhaps the Sniper defense, or perhaps the new book titled The Dark Knight System (a specific way to play 1...Nc6).
Hope your king Indian works out. But if it doesn't try the Nimzo and bogo
I realize that, I was just comparing them in terms of aggression.
"2nd Gashimov Memorial, Round 2 - Hosts: GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko & GM Nijat Abasov"
by kleelof 7 minutes ago
4/18/2015 - Tactics In The Distance
by Dadnavy71 13 minutes ago
For Sale-Fantastic Deal For Someone !
by ROBB_CHESS 15 minutes ago
Podium Prediction Plus (PPP) - "Kasparov - Short 2015"
by awesomechess1729 15 minutes ago
by AngusTheFirst 19 minutes ago
Losing the bishop on purpose for no gain?
by ningyuan 29 minutes ago
Not resigning - lose on time
by TerraPi 29 minutes ago
What is the point of even trying to be a GM *if*...
by XDave121X 33 minutes ago
12/2/2014 - The Center
by keb2012 34 minutes ago
Do you think chess and mathematics are related?
by DrSpudnik 37 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!