12145 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Here is the position I am wondering about with the moves leading up to it
Yo dudes, no need to turn this into a personal attack, even if you hold the gibberish opening (that was my first thought when I saw 'qsfl') dear to your heart. We're only here to refute/defend the lines, and demonstrate why it is or is not playable. As of right now, I don't see a single playable line for white if black plays correctly.
You are too scared to admit it. Plus you failed to adress my next question, at what move?
why does white do 5. e4, and nacht, i have refuted everyone of your lines.
Shepi explain to me the bad structure, lack of space and development. You are garbage and your input is worthless, you just say this without naming moves or stating why. Also, dr spudnick, there is no reason to bash this opening without reason and this openig was just invented by the_gavinator and I, that is why everyone doesnt play it.
It might help your chess to learn what such concepts are instead of bashing others who make you feel ignorant. Space, defined crudely, is roughly the number of squares controlled by your pieces. Development is generally defined by the position of one's pieces--one's pieces are developed when they have left their home on the first or eighth rank. A piece is well developed when it controls several squares, preferrably at the center of the board.
Bad structure - doubled pawns fixed in place, weak pawn on d3 that Nachtwulf has shown how to attack.
Lack of space - pawn on d3 takes away lines, you can't easily gain files or space to put your pieces on.
Lack of development - your pieces are tied to the defense of the d3 and b2 pawns, and black is going to slowly develop an initiative.
When people name moves you say those moves will never be played and shouldn't be shown. So I instead tell you the problems with whites position, but you aren't good enough to understand what these normal chess terms mean.
Also, my input is garbage, lol. Engines and players alike agree with me.
After Nxd3 cxd3 black is .2 ahead - which is only slightly better. However, as white you are playing for an advantage, not to be slightly worse.
Lol - After bxb4+ c3 dxc3 simply wins a pawn. you shut up.
White plays e4 to temporarily block the bishop and allow his own to place a check with Bxb4+, winning material.
This thread has jumped the shark.
and the shark has a laser beam!
center control, also what would you play there
@ what up
Oh and the bishop gets a nice spot at b3 so it makes sence to give up a pawn for that
I believe that some lines might be playable, but not these giberish lines that whatsupyodog came up with.
Yeah, but anyone who has a semi open mind, would look at my line, then that would be appreciated
Jetfighter - I don't believe black has compensation for the pawns, but black is better than white is in most of the regular lines of this opening. It's kind of like a danish gambit: not that great but quite interesting.
Jetfighter i would either do a4 or just nc3 to be better deveopled. Also, shepi all of the lines said so far are playable, and jetfighter, sorry if i insulted you, i did not mean to.
two things, Nc3 has already been played, and a4 does nothing to develop, you are deffinately have no clue what you are talking about
a4 wasnt done to develop, it was to do a5 or b5 if something prevented a5 that allowed b5. Sorry i ment Nf3, and i would like an apology accepted.
These are all of the lines I have discussed thus far. Black has achieved equality or better in each:
Nacht, honestly, what are are you trying to prove with that, you did not put in one of my refutation lines which i had for every variation in that in which white clearly came out better in every one.
yes he did, every move you input, he countered, keep track of your own comments, you truly have no clue what you are talking about
1/31/2015 - Ryklis-Ivasyuk, USSR 1982
by Gil-Gandel 4 minutes ago
Little_Dabbler vs Granturismo1 -- Glitch cost me game
by notmtwain 7 minutes ago
I'm getting lag only on chess.com
by tranchant 11 minutes ago
Does anyone want to be a Great Chess Player?
by michael432000 12 minutes ago
by DrFrank124c 12 minutes ago
by tranchant 12 minutes ago
checkmate, checkmate, check - mate! ...and one more checkmate
by aks1210 13 minutes ago
Variations/Lines of the Petroff Defence ?
by onkelbruno2000 14 minutes ago
by RG1951 15 minutes ago
Custom Chess Positions for Tournaments and Games
by Nekhemevich 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!