11377 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
for those too lazy to go to page 1 here is the analysis
whatup, you ruined a great forum in that entirely dry, unreasonable, uneducated, and uncooth responce to me replying with sound and sane moves, and calling someone garbage only makes you garbage especially if you are unwilling to bend.
Jetfighter my little brother got on sorry about that but thanks for the insults.
Btw qb3 followed by a3 stops everyting you did right there
sorry I know how little brothers can be, atleast mine doesn't know my password, sorry bout that, had no clue about that.
After your lines ive decided parham is the way to go.
actually I think cxb4 is less threatening
here is why cxb4 doesn't work
There's no point to 5...e5 if the b4 square is blocked...
5...Na6 should be fine.
no they do na6 first after nb5 and white has nothing cxd4 is easily winable for white. cxb4 is why im switching to parham.
Yeah, jetfighter I'd rather just play an immediate Na6 then sack my pawn advantage.
There's nothing wrong with playing this way. 4.b4 is just a blunder.
b4 was the aggressive try. e3 is probably more sound, with positionoal advantage.
yes there is white may easily gain material after cxd4 but cxb4 isnt very good for white, thats why the parham is the way to go
Paul, read OP. Don't just call it bad, give a move order/board.
Maybe you should just try 3.Bg5.
The Gavinator, whatupyodog, please give concrete variations as to why 4. ... cxd4 does not work, because a lot of strong people have advocated that move
if 4. e3, than that's irrelevant. We didn't consider the soundness of b4, but it seemed like an aggressive try. e3 is a little more sound, and wins position.
cxb4 and cxd4 both win pawns, but cxd4 is stronger by a lot. cxb4 just plays like a gambit.
Instead of studying middle game with your friend , you try to discover an opening.The result is that you say nonsense(at least).A move that is a nonsense and obviously a mistake is characterized:
"Winning attack for white"
A position that is a nonsense and obviously very bad for white is characterized:
"White is obviously dominating"
A "normal" 1.d4 opening is characterized :
"Reversed Italian Game" !?!?!?!?!?
And after only 3 moves and without Black making any mistake:
"White's development dominates"(in a position where Black has already equalise)
The most funny of all is that you want .....
"to discuss this opening in complete seriousness"
.......and you don't mind to be criticized if it is done....
"in a professional manner."
We were all beginners at some point.To be beginner is not bad , on the contrary , it is exciting.What is bad is not knowing that you are beginner or not acting like beginner.
Beginners first try to understand the basic principles and then "create" their own openings.You have complete ignorance of every basic principle and that results in having no evaluation skills at all and not even the slightest understanding of what is happening on the board , rr of what is good and what is bad.The worst(again) is that you don't know it and you continue saying nonsense , losing your time and , beleving that you do something serious.
You said you need a "professional opinion".Here is one:
"Stop the nonsense and start studying chess seriously"
The others tried to be polite , I tried to be sincere and if you put aside your "ego" you will realise that I actually try to help you(although I am quite sure I can't , nobody can, you will keep losing your time with your friend instead of taking a GOOD book and trying to study GOOD games).
7/5/2015 - Lasker - Alekhine, London 1913
by glsmith a few minutes ago
I want to improve should I quit playing blitz?
by wonderballer 3 minutes ago
Mangus lost in Norway blitz?
by Martin_Stahl 7 minutes ago
Kasparov bad role model for others
by iMacChess 8 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Chess Champions
by macer75 9 minutes ago
i am really getting bored of chess what should i do
by Sasha136 10 minutes ago
HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE? 1800+
by Zigwurst 14 minutes ago
Giving up Bishop and Rook for Checkmate
by blameitontheknight 14 minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by RonaldJosephCote 15 minutes ago
In Memory of knightspawn5
by trysts 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!