14941 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I am convinced that the reason the Sicilian is so dangerous for beginners,(and sometimes intermediate players who are unversed in its theory) is that in many lines every single tempo is crucial and playing even a slightly inaccurate move can see your position collapse.
The French is a bit less difficult to play I think for a beginner although I used to get destroyed by 4. Bg5 in the French when I tried playing it a few times. I agreed with the comment about playing the French Exchange Variation for a beginner.
Focusing on openings is a beginner's worst enemy.
Beginners problem are the not well known lines in the opening. So try to sidestep the main lines to confuse them a little bit.
Beginner's enemy includes (but not limited to)
Beginner's enemy is when they know a bit of theory and think that everybody who does things a bit differently doesn't know how to play chess. Your list is a good example, because the variations you listed are perfectly playable.
1) that's the Rubinstein French, it is played even at GM level.
2) in that Scandinavian, after white blocks the check with Be2 black plays c6 and retreats the queen to c7. In the end black's queen is well placed and white's lsB is not active. Nothing wrong with 3...Qe5+
3) playing 2.Bc4 is a bit premature, but the system with Nf3 and Bc4 deserves respect. Of course white should follow up correctly and play for c3 and d4.
4) queen pawn game with 2.e3 is a Colle/Zuckertort, even if with an odd move order. Again, legit opening.
5) this one I agree.
Beginners who play black have a hard time against the c3 Italian/Evans or the 2 knights/Prussian game. With that I don't mean just the Ng5 line but also the d4 lines.
Usually they lose the centre with black or Nf6 gets pushed around by e5.
The King's Gambit. Even better would be the Vienna Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 followed by f4, often after a horrible, but natural looking blunder by black) Even decent players underestimate it because it looks dubious. Actually, it is dubious, but not as dubious as it looks.
I'd have to say the Reti, English, or any other strategically rich opening since beginners usually focus mostly on tactics and don't know what to do in quiet positions.
Russian Variation of Grunfeld. lol
Rushing Variation of Grunfeld.
Ghhh. I hate the French too. The Advance with Qb6 is my enemy, maybe I should try the exchange lines.
When I play black proper play with any system pushing the f pawn, or the QG.. I play the Pirc as black alot and when around move 5-7 white moves f4 it bothers me if I can not exploit it..
Agree with others... PIc, KID, Alekhine's, many Sicilians, obscure gambits, things like that.
French doesn't seem bad at all. If you're clueless about the attacks your peers are likely clueless also. The problem with the pirc for example is you think you're ok, but get a bad position and lose without either player knowing why exactly.
Well, I played this as black - I should really stick to my sicilian next time. :)
funny you would say, I have a game right now playing the pirc where it started out ok,, gained the e pawn and after a rather organic series of exchanges my position is terrible. For the most part though up to my current rating the pirc has served me well and is responsible for many of wins against higher ranked players.. Play for a draw, developing tit for tat and every once in a while white's position collapses..
I took the OP as openings playing against, not playing. I used to play alehkine's and plan on revisiting it soon it would be ashame to abandon all those games.. The problem with alekhine's is time, ply wise its a beast...
Sicllian Dragon and Nadjorf because beginners memorise lines rather than understanding chess.
Sorry I took "enemy" as being an enemy of a beginner's efforts to improve. The OP seemed to be more about winning.
Enemy of a beginner's efforts to improve: Sicilian Dragon. It is probably the sharpest variation. One wrong move and the beginner would lose. Sad thing is, the beginner might not even understand why he lost if he does not know the theoretical and positional aspects of the various positions.
use scotch because it's awesome and super aggressive
It depends on the players and their opponents knowledge about the particular opening played...
why e4 is better than d4.
by noobcakeslol a few minutes ago
by Cogwheel a few minutes ago
Retropenings ... How did we get here ?
by pelly13 a few minutes ago
help with the scilian
by heister a few minutes ago
Chess By Post
by -waller- 3 minutes ago
How many knight + bishop endgame mates have actually happened in your games ?
by Martin_Stahl 3 minutes ago
Alekhine's Defense Brilliancy - destroyed a guy in only 7 moves :O
by noobcakeslol 5 minutes ago
Thursday at Attica
by Sangwin 6 minutes ago
by varelse1 7 minutes ago
What Magnus mentally learnt me by his WC playing
by DjonniDerevnja 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!