9801 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This happens against me frequently when I am playing the Cambridge Springs. A few days ago two different players ( 1500's and 1600's) made the same exact moves against me on the same day.
I see this one in the Philidor quite often:
As I play the French as Black, Bb5 in the advance variation is also something I see all the time.
Why is 3...Bg4 bad in the Philidor?
I dunno King, I often purposely play things I know are bad in the opening ...or are supposed to be bad anyway, for the express purpose of making my opponent prove it. About 75% of the time they can't and wind up losing. The opening especially in blitz which is extremely popular online is not as important as it is in standard play. Citing stats for professionals is of little relevance to the avgerage player and many times I have had people tell me how my opening moves were weak and yet they were outplayed as the game went on or even where they weren't outplayed they overstepped the time limits trying to figure out how to prove me wrong.
The Ulvestad, while not played much, is misplayed by amateurs nearly 100% of the time.
Bg4 in this philidor position gives white an enormous advantage, as shown by Morphy in his famous "Opera house game".
I here you can blunder an entire bishop in the Cambridge Springs but no one never shows me how that can happen do you know ?
Because 4. dxe5 gives White a definite edge: taking back with 4. ... dxe5 is obviously a blunder as
wins a pawn as well as taking away Black's right to castle, and on top of that immediately followed up by the threat of Nxg4 as well as Nxf7+. The correct continuation:
gives White at least a great initiative and the bishop pair in an open position. And there's a nice trap: 6. Bc4 threatens mate in one and the "natural" 6. ... Nf6 allows 7. Qb3, winning at least a pawn (but in my blitz games often enough either a rook or even mate).
To answer OP probably the Parham.
Stop trolling other threads, Gavi. This is a warning.
I saw you talked about Philidor but I didn't find about quick mate in it.I checkmated some people with this:
That's Legal's Mate :) I think I never actually got to play this (but in the Philidor I always play the mainline 3. d4). I think I won one blitz game with the 3. ... Bg4 variation like this:
Oh, Legal mate, of course! :) I forgot!
Here is one 1. e4 d5 2. e5? and Black is better already.
Here is another way to lose a bishop
sexism in chess?
by Pulpofeira a few minutes ago
Do numbers exist?
by allthegoodnamestaken 4 minutes ago
Carlsen's next opponent in the WCC match
by fabelhaft 5 minutes ago
Exploiting Discovered Checks
by dzikus 10 minutes ago
why extra bonus rating ?
by kiloNewton 10 minutes ago
11/27/2014 - Mate in 4
by CARPETT 11 minutes ago
I won a Tournament :)
by kaynight 12 minutes ago
Your Questions about Chess
by robbie_1969 20 minutes ago
11/22/2007 - Super Sacrifices
by shivang55 31 minutes ago
Три Богатыря Київської Русі
by Timofey_Valetskiy 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!