10582 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
When I was starting playing chess with the idea of learning, the openings made an impression of being "cool". However, I took the common advice, learned some basic opening principles, played 1. e4, 1. e4 e5 and 1. d4 d5 and that was it. At that time my knowledge of lines ended around move 3.
To be honest, I'm not having a much greater opening knowledge now. Of course, I've remembered some moves and ideas from studying games and books as well as from games I played myself. I've watched an occasional video on the openings I was aiming for at a given time (for example the Evans Gambit). During that time I realised that knowing openings, especially specific variations, is one of the least important for a player of my level.
So, I'm still on the stage of 1. e4, 1. e4 e5 and 1. d4 d5. Lately, I've been trying a bit of 1. d4, hoping to get some grasp of the Queen's Gambit. I know it's perfectly fine to play those. I do wonder though, whether there comes the time when you should start concerning yourself with some more specific openings? If, let's say, I will acquire some factual ability to play somewhat good chess by playing a narrow group of openings, will it be hard to acquaint myself with other openings later?
Don't know if it "will be hard to acquaint (yourself) myself with other openings later?" but I found that playing the same opening for both w and b over time and checking out some of the lines can be helpful.
I find too much of the literature to be way over my head...So I just play to have fun.
Thanks, any other opinions? Sorry for the long read :P
About move 50.
At 1700, you should have a very strong familiarity of basic opening concepts. And a good groundwork of the openings you play. You should be in familiar territory at move 7 or 8, 90% of the time. That is, you can remember playing this line before. Anytime you get surprised in the opening, look it up! Commit it to memory.
The opening is just as important as the middlegame, or the endgame. It should be given just as much priority.
You will need to research other moves if these ones become refuted, AND you routinely play opponents of high enough a level to take advantage of the supposed refutations.
In other words, you'll never need to branch out. You may WANT to, but 1.e4, 1...e5, and 1...d5 are more than enough to get you through a lifetime of chess in good standing.
"Knights before bishops"
But the Nimzo-Larsen attack moves out the bishops first.
"Queen should never be out early"
What about 1.e4,c5 2.Nf3,e6 3.d4,cxd4 4.Nxd4,Qb6!? 5.Nb3,Qc7? Also falls under don't move the same piece twice the queen displaced the knight to b3 and heads back to c7 to watch over the c-file and perhaps support e5 later. Nigel Short defeated a 2550 with it. Remember, you don't need to defeat GMs with it, only people in your tournament section.
"Capture towards the center"
And give up that nice d-file control in certain Paulsen mainlines or not take advantage of the tempo to activate the bishop in the Ruy Lopez Exchange?
"Never exchange bishop for a knight"
Then black won't get lightsquare domination and break white's pawns in the Nimzo-Indian.
"Develop pawn storms"
And create targets for your opponent in the endgame.
"Create outside passed pawns for the endgame"
1.e4,c5 2.b4?,cxb4 3.a3,d5! is far superior to bxa3?! which indeed obtains such a pawn.
I mean no offense by contradicting you I'm just having fun
Whenever you want, chess is a game.
Memorising openings isn't what a good player does, instead following principles will make you automatically play the best lines in the opening e.g
Yes and no. Just as important as learning the accepted principles of the opening phase is learning when to ignore them. That will usually be after the opponent has done something to unbalance the game.
Just as an example, I'll quote a few opening moves from an OTB (over-the-board) tournament game of mine, where my opponent makes an error or two in the opening, unbalancing the game enough that I can profitably ignore the usual opening principles:
Great game, blueemu! Your annotations are very instructive.
5/28/2015 - Mate in 3
by -_KNiGHt_- 15 minutes ago
Should chess players wear clothing with ads to get sponsorship & funding?
by bumiputra 20 minutes ago
Spirituality of Symbols in Chess
by 1Corinthians13 25 minutes ago
How can I become an SA in my group?
by FMchesskid 26 minutes ago
Why chess.com builds people on here and affects them
by johnny_BACON 35 minutes ago
Why does nobody play 1. c3?
by Ed_Seedhouse 37 minutes ago
Positional Play: What is it, really? Show us an example
by ipcress12 44 minutes ago
Find the best move
by AZhao17 47 minutes ago
What other benefits do you derived?
by TunjiGold 52 minutes ago
by ponz111 55 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!