10536 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I hate 1.d4 because many players then play 2.e3 3. c3, 4.Bf4 , etc bored systems, solid but bored without imagination.
Against 1.d4 i play the magic 1...e5 and i am happy with the board. Englund gambit is the best system to ensure a tactic game.
It is a weak reply, maybe you want the Benko gambit instead?
whenever i annotate games i mark anything other than d4 as a blunder for white
I tend to think all boredom is resolved by winning. The creation of boredom is also mentioned in Sun Tzu's Art of War as a valid tactic for winning. Thus, beware of the boring opponent.
+1I dont know why people hate on the London so much, I find my london games just as interesting as the Benko, Jaenisch, tromp or hopton games I play.Its always interesting to see the small accumulation of mistakes black ususally makes transfer into an advantage for white, and often black has no idea why they gte bad positions.
People who make statements like 'd4 is positional, e4 is tactical' or 'd4 is passive, e4 is aggressive' are probably the same people whose entire understanding of chess revolves around trying to mate on the f2/f7 square in the first few moves of the game.
Kind of repeating what has been said but there are many extremely tactical variations that can occur afterr d4 and many very quiet lines that can occur after e4. Think the Botvinnik system in the semi-slav or the Giuoco Pianissimo. Actually I think the most significant difference between the two moves is that the various openings that can occur after d4 are often much more similar than the different variations that occur after e4. So by playing d4 you can kind of anticipate the structures that will arise, whereas black's choice of opening after e4 can lead into very different types of games.
Yes, but i play for fun that is my first aim . I won´t make money winnin in chess. When someone plays systems like Colle or another system where their pieces are 15-20 moves without cross the fourth line, i ask myself if really these guys are playin chess .
I feel the same, I like to play againist d4-c4 but playing against the Colle or the London is just too boring. Especially the Colle tends to give black zero counterplay.
i personally hate when my opponet plays d4 since i don't get to play the sicilian which i like playing when my opponet plays d4 i have to play a more passive opening like the nimzo
You cant play the parham if you play d4.
You still haven't responded to my line, where black is practically winning.
There is a common fallacy, whereby someone playing black believes that if white plays some inferior moves that black should have a forced win. Most of the time this is not the case. The Parham is not exactly refutable, however with correct play black should get at least equality and probably a small advantage, but there is no way that black is 'winning' out of the opening. I would say that it is playable, if not exactly good, at amateur level.
In both the parham refutation thread and the 1. e4 e5 2. Qh5 thread.
I myself prefer 1.d4...but I have been hearing about this "Parham Opening" so much lately, I will need to look see.
If we are looking at openings from an offensive standpoint, e4 is superior to any other opening... this is why many people don't like d4- or Nf3 for that matter.
why is nf3 not agressive you are already putting a peice out on the first move? also its very flexible as well
Why hasn't Ivanov been banned yet?
by learningthemoves a few minutes ago
How to win in chess
by checqm8 a few minutes ago
HOW TO ANALYSE CHESS END-GAMES
by Geller_uri99 a few minutes ago
The Ultimate Test of Engine Fanatics
by Otomun a few minutes ago
Fun King Walk - how to avoid it?
by LongIslandMark 3 minutes ago
The Great Pawn March
by king_me_wing 5 minutes ago
Reassess, my system, endgame
by Wilbert_78 6 minutes ago
by Portishead93 7 minutes ago
Fischer: mentally disturbed or just mean spirited jerk?
by davebrah 8 minutes ago
clock scid vs pc
by stevenaaus 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!