One of the general opening rules is Knights before Bishops... We've all heard it... But I'm not too sure of its reasoning. Anyone care to enlighten me on this guideline?!
I think it is down to piece value, Knights are seen as better in the opening and middle game it's believed that they contribute more to the position when things are tight. Bishops are seen as better in the endgame when the material reduces down and there is more space.
I understood that it is because it is easier to decide where to place your knights ...
Bishops have more money, so the poor Knights have to go directly to the Front.
Exactly!
1. A Knight can move without first moving pawns.
2. Knight moves are ambiguous since they have only certain squares that make sense and such moves a general with most openings. A Bishop's landing square telegraph's the player's intentions. So, moving Knight's first is a way of not showing your cards too soon.
3. By the same token, often the Bishop's best square can be better determined once the other player has committed himself to some plan. Generally, with the Knight's the choice of squares is limited anyway.
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
Mark all forum topics as READ